Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alaskan Leader Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2020
19
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$32kHuman Services$21kHousing & Shelter$14kReligion$14kArts & Culture$9kHealth$9kEnvironment$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHER FRANCIS SHELTER$7,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
ALEKNAGIK TRADITIONAL COUNCIL$3,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$2,000
ST SERAPHIM OF SAROV$2,000
KODIAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,000
NATIVE VILLAGE OF PORT HEIDEN$2,000
DILLINGHAM SENIOR CENTER$2,000
HOLY ROSARY CHURCH$2,000
UNITED TRIBES OF BRISTOL BAY$1,400
TWIN HILLS VILLAGE COUNCIL$1,200
TRADITIONAL COUNCIL OF TOGIAK$1,000
SOUTHWEST ALASKA VOC & ED CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CLARKS POINT VILLAGE COUNCIL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KODIAK WOMEN'S RESOURCE AND CRISIS CENTER: $3k → 8%LITTLE ANGELS CHILDCARE ACADEMY: $2k → 20%MARRULUT ENIIT ASSISTED LIVING: $2k → 20%LITTLE ANGELS CHILDCARE ACADEMY: $1k → 20%THRESHOLD SERVICES INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Alaskan Leader Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Alaskan Leader Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 15 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$77k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+8%

Still filing today

13%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BROTHER FRANCIS SHELTER
    3× · 2017–2020 · $14k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $9k
  • KC
    KODIAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $9k

Funded once

  • KW
    Kodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +8%
  • KA
    Kodiak Area Mentoring Program Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -39%
  • BR
    BBNA REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kodiak Maritime Museum

Exhibit Kodiak Maritime history

Arts & Culture
2
Kodiak Rodeo and State Fair in

Provide a land area and facility for the Kodiak Island resident to enjoy outdoor activities including a fair and rodeo, concerts and other outdoor community activities.

Recreation & Sports
3
Kodiak Archipelago Leadership Institute

Our mission is to support the long-term sustainability of our regions coastal communities of Alutiiq heritage. We do this in three ways, 1. Leadership & Advocacy, 2. Community Development, and 3. Our Stories.

Community Improvement
4
Kodiak Baranof Productions Inc

Provide concerts, plays - both amateur and professional, festivals, art shows, education and an outlet for local art.

Arts & Culture
5
Kodiak Public Media Inc

To educate, communicate, and inform the communities in the Kodiak Island Borough. And to capture the communities history everyday.

Arts & Culture
6
Kodiak Kindness Project

The Kodiak Kindness Project (KKP) exists to help families nourish their babies' bodies and souls, providing free, individualized education and support for nourishing their babies, regardless of income or feeding choices, filing a crucial…

Education
7
Alaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessness

To increase affordable housing and end homelessness in Alaska.

Housing & Shelter
8
Alaska Sustainability Initiative

To advance solutions that build the resilience and sustainability of Alaska, for its current and future residents and the natural systems upon which they depend.

Animals
9
Kenai Alive

The mission of Kenai Alive! is to change lifestyle behaviors on the Kenai Peninsula. It is also involved and is taking the lead in developing a Health Prevention Network in Kenai.

—
10
Stand Up Alaska

To Harness the power of the diverse people of Alaska and their communities to empower and support transformative social change. Stand Up Alaska is an Alaskan-led movement providing intersectional and diverse views on issues affecting all…

Civil Rights
11
Alaska Public Interest Research Group

Consumer Advocacy

Public Benefit
12
Kodiakcare Corporation

At KodiakCare, we love dogs and their people. KodiakCare saves the lives of dogs by providing funding for critical veterinary care to families who lack financial means.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center; the most unlike its peers is Little Angels Childcare Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROTHER FRANCIS SHELTER: $14,000 · OtherBROTHER FRANCIS SHELTERST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC SCHOOLKODIAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherKODIAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOLALEKNAGIK TRADITIONAL COUNCIL: $7,000 · OtherALEKNAGIK TRADITIONAL COUNCILNATIVE VILLAGE OF PORT HEIDEN: $6,500 · OtherNATIVE VILLAGE OF PORT HEIDENIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · OtherTWIN HILLS VILLAGE COUNCIL: $4,500 · OtherTOGIAK PUBLIC LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $4,000 · Other+35 more: $51,940 · Other+35 moreKodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center: $3,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE ANGELS CHILDCARE ACADEMY: $3,000 · Human ServicesMarrulut Eniit Assisted Living Inc % City of Dillingham: $2,000 · Human ServicesThreshold Services Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesHospice and Palliative Care-Ko: $2,500 · HealthKodiak Area Mentoring Program Inc: $2,500 · Crime & LegalIsland Trails Network: $1,500 · EnvironmentKodiak Historical Society: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHumane Society of Kodiak: $1,000 · Animals
Other$115,940Human Services$9,000Health$2,500Crime & Legal$2,500Environment$1,500Arts & Culture$1,000Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE ANGELS CHILDCARE ACADEMY: $3,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMarrulut Eniit Assisted Living Inc % City of Dillingham: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE AND FEAR-FREE ENVIRONMENT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKodiak Historical Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kodiak Womens Resource and Cri Center ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE ANGELS CHILDCARE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Hospice and Palliative Care-Ko ↗
  • Who funds Kodiak Area Mentoring Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marrulut Eniit Assisted Living Inc % City of Dillingham ↗
  • Who funds SAFE AND FEAR-FREE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Island Trails Network ↗
  • Who funds Threshold Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationAK23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alaskan Leader Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alaskan Leader Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alaskan Leader Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Alaskan Leader Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alaskan Leader’s filings →

    More from the funding graph