How much did BRISTOL BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of BRISTOL BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

promo promoemployment groupopps youthemployment seasonalemployment promopromo oppsinternships fisheries

2019

employment technicalyouth youthtrainings youthtrainings technicalyouth seasonalpromotion grouppromotion seasonal

2020

bsai commercialcommercial fisheriesfisheries interestsinterests promotionpromotion youthpointemployment youth

2021

traditionallevelocknaknek villagepromotionpointtribalinternships

2022

workershealth carebbahc healthemployment seasonalfishingpromotion youthinternships seasonal

2023

cbg drawdownartic terndrawdown liasontern liasondrawdown articliason articvocational education

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k4 grants · $30k
$10k–50k10 grants · $222k
$50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
$250k+12 grants · $7.7M

$105,580

Median grant

States reached

$395M

Total assets

Largest grants

PILOT POINT TRIBAL COUNCIL$1,156,498
BRISTOL BAY SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE$1,000,000
CLARKS POINT VILLAGE COUNCIL$866,056
ALEKNAGIK TRADITIONAL COUNCIL$844,148
UGASHIK TRADITIONAL VILLAGE$724,745
CURYUNG TRIBAL COUNCIL$679,363
NAKNEK VILLAGE COUNCIL$626,249
EKWOK VILLAGE COUNCIL$523,025
MANOKOTAK VILLAGE COUNCIL$410,729
UNITED TRIBES OF BRISTOL BAY$313,525
KING SALMON TRIBAL COUNCIL$287,500
EKUK VILLAGE COUNCIL$265,801
TRADITIONAL COUNCIL OF TOGIAK$198,534
LEVELOCK VILLAGE COUNCIL$185,450
LAKE & PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT$150,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$74M · 54 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2023, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$74M

$508k

Still filing today

22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $898k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthScience & TechEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BB
BRISTOL BAY SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE
7× · 2017–2023 · $5.8M · revenue +75% · 59% of their budget
BB
BRISTOL BAY NATIVE ASSOCIATION
6× · 2017–2023 · $126k · revenue +13%
SA
SAFE AND FEAR-FREE ENVIRONMENT
6× · 2017–2023 · $79k · revenue +27%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF CLARK'S POINT
one grant, 2020 · $300k
CO
CITY OF PILOT POINT
one grant, 2017 · $25k
US
UNITED STATES SEAFOODS LLC
one grant, 2017 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bering Omega Community Health Services

Bering omega community health services exists to nurture the well being and meet the physical emotional and spiritual needs of persons affected by hiv/aids through compassionate health care and social services.

Health

Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative

Environment

Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission

To safeguard the bowhead whale and its habitat, to defend the Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling Rights of our members, and to preserve the cultural and traditional values of our communities.

—

Bristol Bay Fishermens Association

BBFA seeks to protect salmon resources and represents interests of members and offers and insurance program to members.

—

Alaska Historical Publication Association

Education

Cook Inlet Tribal Council

Citc's (cook inlet tribal council) mission is to work in partnership with alaska native/american indian individuals to connect them to opportunities that fulfill their potential through education and training, child and family services,…

Human Services

Marrulut Eniit Assisted Living Inc

To provide assisted living services to elderly native Americans living in Dillingham, Alaska. In 2020, MEAL discontinued operating as an assisted living facility and started leasing its space to Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation (BBAHC)…

Human Services

Food Bank of Alaska

Food Bank of Alaska believes no one deserves to be hungry We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska

Food & Nutrition

Alaska Wildlife Conservation

Awcc is a sanctuary dedicated to preserving alaska's wildlife through conservation, research, education, and quality animal care.

Animals

Alaska Solstice Search Dogs

Assd trains and deploys highly qualified and certified search dog teams to support and assist law enforcement and other government agencies in the search, rescue, and recovery of missing persons.

Public Safety & Disaster

Alaska State Hockey Association Inc

Youth & adult hockey leagues, tournaments & camps promote youth hockey, develop and encourage sportmanship between all players for the betterment of the individuals physical & social well being.

Unclassified

Bristol Bay Reserve Association

To promote the interests of membership that operate in the Bristol Bay, Alaska salmon fishery

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Bristol Bay Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

10/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$68,392,940Science & Tech$5,750,000Education$1,337,704Human Services$167,616Health$86,558Environment$50,000Community Improvement$24,999

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community FoundationAK25.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Bristol Bay Native Association Inc · Bristol Bay Regional Seafood · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BRISTOL BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BRISTOL BAY SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +75% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 920168036 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BRISTOL BAY SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 59% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp?

Find your warmest path to Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BRISTOL BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp?

More from the funding graph

BRISTOL BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp?

More from the funding graph