Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alan D & Wendy R Wilson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.3MHousing & Shelter$151kHealth$85kYouth Development$70kRecreation & Sports$45kHuman Services$36kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 96% of reported assets are held in Lincoln Financial.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE$50,000
MAGGIES PLACE$25,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$25,000
CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH$10,000
CAVES VALLEY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION$10,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Maggie's Place: $25k → 11%CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH: $10k → 10%MAGGIES PLACE INC: $25k → 11%Cliffs Resident Outreach: $5k → 10%MAGGIES PLACE: $25k → 11%Cliffs Resident Outreach: $5k → 10%Maggie's Place: $20k → 11%CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH: $5k → 10%Ryan House: $25k → 11%CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH: $5k → 10%Ryan House: $20k → 11%CLIFFS RESIDENT OUTREACH: $1k → 10%RYAN HOUSE: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 12 repeat orgs$900k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$2.6M
$900k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $276k · revenue +113%
  • WE
    WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +84%
  • MP
    MAGGIE'S PLACE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UF
    UMBC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • US
    University System of Maryland Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $301k
  • WE
    Woman's Education Alliance, Inc.
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milagro House Inc

Milagro house's mission is to provide educational programming, housing and life-skills training for women and their children who would otherwise be experiencing homelessness. while women are enrolled in our program, they receive a…

Human Services
2
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
3
United Way of Forsyth County Inc

United way of forsyth county is a catalyst for strengthening our community by identifying and addressing its most significant needs through alignment of resources and strategic partnerships to achieve measureable, lasting impact.

—
4
St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families

St. Anns Center helps mothers and children overcome crisis and achieve lasting independence and stability by providing a safe and supportive home, child care, education and employment assistance, and clinical social work services within a…

Human Services
5
Mary's Shelter

Mary's shelter is committed to empowering homeless youth by providing housing, education, and social service programs.

Human Services
6
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
7
Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc

The cabbage patch settlement house, incorporated (the organization") is a local, non-profit empowering children, youth and families to reach their full potential since 1910. the organization's mission is to provide life-changing academic,…

Human Services
8
United Way of Central Georgia Inc

To focus and unite our entire community to create significant lasting change around two issues: family financial stability and homelessness.

Philanthropy
9
Family Promise of Greater Chattanooga Inc

Family promise of greater chattanooga's mission is to provide help for homeless families with children be housed and self-sufficient.

Human Services
10
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
William Peace University

William peace university is a private four-year university in downtown raleigh, north carolina. the mission of the university is to prepare students for careers in the organizations of tomorrow. rooted in the liberal arts tradition, the…

Education
12
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bentley University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UT FOUNDATION: $934,013 · OtherUT FOUNDATIONUMBC FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · OtherUMBC FOUNDATION INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $390,371 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEEUniversity System of Maryland Foundation: $300,806 · OtherUniversity System of Maryland Foundation+8 more: $100,238 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $276,386 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF …WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $240,000 · EducationWOMENS EDUCATION A…CAVES VALLEY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · EducationCAVES VALLEY GOLF …+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $375,726 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED W…MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesRYAN HOUSE: $85,000 · Human ServicesCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $26,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · International
Other$2,225,428Education$561,386Philanthropy$375,726Human Services$272,000Recreation & Sports$80,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $375,726 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $276,386 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $240,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetRYAN HOUSE: $85,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC: $80,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCAVES VALLEY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $26,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF PICKENS COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAVES VALLEY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF PICKENS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL ANDERSON YOUTH HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan D & Wendy R Wilson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan D & Wendy R Wilson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alan D & Wendy R Wilson’s filings →

More from the funding graph