Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alan and Terri Spoon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$203k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.7MScience & Tech$569kArts & Culture$535kPhilanthropy$200kReligion$41kFood & Nutrition$17kCivil Rights$10kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $303k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN$203,200
MIT MUSIC BUILDING FUND (3709310)$99,543
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN$25,000
MIT$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION SARASOTA MANATEE$15,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$5,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITEE$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH$5,000
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN$3,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$3,000
CHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND$2,500
TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRESHMAN FRESH START: $1k → 7%FRESHMAN FRESH START: $750 → 7%FRESHMAN FRESH START: $750 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$936k · 16 repeat orgs$665k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$936k
$555k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+20%

Still filing today

56%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $292k · revenue +31%
  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $256k · revenue +13%
  • MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • M(
    MIT (METRO WAREHOUSE)
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • M(
    MIT (INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTING)
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
12
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Club Preservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,365,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $256,200 · EducationRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC+2 more: $26,000 · EducationMIT (METRO WAREHOUSE): $200,000 · OtherMIT (METRO WAREHOUSE)MIT (INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTING): $200,000 · OtherMIT (INSTITUTE FOR COMP…MIT: $157,500 · OtherMITIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…MIT MUSIC BUILDING FUND (3709310): $99,543 · OtherMIT MUSIC BUILDING FUND…+24 more: $98,852 · Other+24 moreSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $291,697 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN…MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $122,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF F…+2 more: $13,600 · Arts & CultureCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $180,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $19,200 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $2,500 · InternationalCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1,250 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $7,500 · Civil RightsINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $2,500 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND: $2,500 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 · Crime & Legal
Education$2,647,200Other$855,895Arts & Culture$427,297Philanthropy$197,500International$22,950Civil Rights$10,000Crime & Legal$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,365,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $291,697 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $256,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $180,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $122,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $19,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDECORDOVA AND DANA MUSEUM & PARK: $13,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESHMAN FRESH START INC: $2,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOONFULS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BELMONT GOLF SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DECORDOVA AND DANA MUSEUM & PARK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESHMAN FRESH START INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S GUARDIAN FUND ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan and Terri Spoon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan and Terri Spoon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • International Institute of New England Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alan and Terri Spoon Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph