Skip to content

· Public charity

Alachua County Coalition for the Homeless and Hungry Inc

To end homelessness by providing safe shelter, effective services and permanent solutions to people without housing.

$973k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Housing & Shelter$352kHuman Services$140kPublic Safety & Disaster$95kHealth$38kCrime & Legal$36kPhilanthropy$18k
02FY2019 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $17,998, the rows itemized in this filing. The $972,598 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $954,600 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$17,998
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA$17,998
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%ANOTHER WAY INC: $33k → 19%FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE: $49k → 19%LEE CONLEE HOUSE: $45k → 23%ANOTHER WAY INC: $26k → 19%FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE: $35k → 19%LEE CONLEE HOUSE: $36k → 23%PEACEFUL PATHS INC: $48k → 19%PEACEFUL PATHS INC: $48k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$662k · 10 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2019, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$662k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-32%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PEACEFUL PATHS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $95k · revenue +72%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $84k · revenue +233%
  • LC
    LEE CONLEE HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $81k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of North Central Florida Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emergency Services and Homeless Coalition of St Johns County Inc

To truly make a difference in the lives of St. Johns County homeless families with minor children by providing housing and services required for them to remain intact, stabilize their lives, save money, move into permanent housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Family Promise of Southeast Florida Inc

The Organization's mission is to empower families in making their transition from homelessness to sustainable independence.

Religion
3
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
4
Jones Alternative Inc

Jones Alternative provides Therapeutic Residential Group Home services to female victims ofsexual trauma, including molestation, rape, incest, and human trafficking, who are underthe care of the Florida Department of Children and Families…

Health
5
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
6
First Step Shelter Inc

To develop, manage and operate the First Step Shelter Program, a homeless assistance service program and shelter in Volusia County, Florida.

Housing & Shelter
7
Baldwin Family Violence Shelter

To operate and maintain a protective shelter for battered and/or abused women, men, and children or those affected by family violence.

Human Services
8
Refuge House Inc

To provide direct services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and to their children and families, as well as to eliminate such violence through community education and public advocacy.

Human Services
9
90 Works Inc

Overcoming homelessness, poverty, and family violence by becoming self-sufficient

—
10
A Better Way Services Inc

To reduce domestic abuse, sexual assault and suicide in our community through shelter services, crisis intervention and prevention initiatives.

—
11
Adoption Authority Inc

Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.

—
12
Family Promise of Baldwin County

To provide temporary shelter, related services and nuturing support to housing insecure families with children in baldwin county.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lee Conlee House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Promise of Gainesville Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEACEFUL PATHS INC: $95,413 · Human ServicesPEACEFUL PATHS INCFAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INC: $84,185 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INCLEE CONLEE HOUSE INC: $80,813 · Human ServicesLEE CONLEE HOUSE INCANOTHER WAY INC: $59,201 · Human ServicesANOTHER WAY INCGAINESVILLE AGENCY CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $100,054 · OtherGAINESVILLE AGENCY CATHOLIC CHARITIESCATHOLIC CHARITIES BUREAU INC: $97,891 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES BUREAU INCTHREE RIVERS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $36,494 · OtherTHREE RIVERS LEGAL SERVICES INCMERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC: $38,070 · HealthMERIDIAN B…CDS FAMILY & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $24,316 · HealthCDS FAMILY…St Francis House: $45,583 · Housing & ShelterUnited Way of North Central Florida Inc: $17,998 · Philanthropy
Human Services$319,612Other$234,439Health$62,386Housing & Shelter$45,583Philanthropy$17,998

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEACEFUL PATHS INC: $95,413 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INC: $84,185 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetLEE CONLEE HOUSE INC: $80,813 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetANOTHER WAY INC: $59,201 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSt Francis House: $45,583 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC: $38,070 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $36,494 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCDS FAMILY & BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $24,316 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of North Central Florida Inc: $17,998 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of North Central Florida IncFL26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of North Central Florida Inc · Clay Electric Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Florida · United Way of St Johns County Inc · First Federal Foundation Inc · Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alachua County Coalition for the Homeless and Hungry Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alachua County Coalition for the Homeless and Hungry Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Peaceful Paths Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Another Way Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Lee Conlee House Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Gainesville Florida Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Cds Family & Behavioral Health Services: 4% of income from government
  • United Way of North Central Florida Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $720k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alachua County Coalition for the Homeless and Hungry’s filings →

More from the funding graph