Skip to content
Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc

Alabama coalition against rape, inc's mission is to reduce incidences of sexual assault.

$380k
Granted FY2018
18
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Human Services$444kHealth$170kCrime & Legal$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kReligion$12k
02FY2018 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $371k
$21,928
Median grant
1
States reached
$963k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAPE COUNSELORS OF EAST ALABAMA INC$34,219
CRISIS CENTER OF BIRMINGHAM$30,669
LIFELINES FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER$30,566
2ND CHANCE$30,146
LIGHTHOUSE COUNSELING CENTER$29,034
SAFE HOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY$27,919
FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$26,181
MONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE$22,872
CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$21,928
TURNING POINT$18,000
VICTIM SERVICES$16,866
ASHAKIRAN INC$16,469
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION$14,373
HOUSE OF RUTH$14,350
CRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY$13,128
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $30k → 11%LIFELINES FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $31k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $26k → 11%LIFELINES FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $23k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$651k · 15 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$651k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $56k · revenue +140%
  • RC
    RAPE COUNSELORS OF EAST ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $56k · revenue +89%
  • FC
    Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $54k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AI
    AshaKiran Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $16k · revenue 0%
  • WC
    WARD CHAPEL AME CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • WO
    WOMEN OF REFINED GOLD
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
2
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
3
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
4
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
5
Crisis Control Center

Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

Human Services
6
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
7
Three Rivers Crisis Center

Eliminating domestic violence and sexual abuse in our society.

Human Services
8
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
9
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
10
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
11
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
12
Family Crisis Center

Assist individuals and families in crisis from domestic violence, sexual assault, crime and economic emergencies. Services are also available to friends and family members of those involved.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rape Counselors of East Alabama Inc; the most unlike its peers is Turning Point Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISIS CENTER INC: $60,529 · OtherCRISIS CENTER INC2ND CHANCE INC: $56,093 · Other2ND CHANCE INCTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC: $49,800 · OtherTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INCLIGHTHOUSE COUNSELING CENTER INC: $47,831 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE COUNSELING CENTER INCCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc: $40,222 · OtherCrisis Services of North Alabama IncTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $31,126 · OtherTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INCMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $28,033 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATIONWARD CHAPEL AME CHURCH: $12,032 · Other+1 more: $8,600 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $56,308 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMAFamily Counseling Center of Mobile Inc: $53,650 · Human ServicesFamily Counseling Center of Mobile IncMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $40,896 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRA…Victim Services of Cullman Inc: $36,868 · Human ServicesVictim Services of Cullman IncBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $29,854 · Human ServicesBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTERAshaKiran Inc: $16,469 · Human ServicesAshaKiran IncRAPE COUNSELORS OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $55,997 · HealthRAPE COUNSELORS…TURNING POINT FOUNDATION: $37,818 · HealthTURNING POINT F…CRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY: $26,128 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$334,266Human Services$234,045Health$93,815Public Safety & Disaster$26,128

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $56,308 over 2y, 8.5% of budget2ND CHANCE INC: $56,093 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetRAPE COUNSELORS OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $55,997 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE SAFEHOUSE OF SHELBY COUNTY INC: $49,800 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA FAMILY VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $40,896 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT FOUNDATION: $37,818 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetVictim Services of Cullman Inc: $36,868 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $31,126 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBALDWIN FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $29,854 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF RUSSELL COUNTY: $26,128 over 2y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alabama Coalition…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceAL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alabama Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alabama Coalition Against Rape Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alabama Coalition Against Rape’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home