Skip to content

· Private foundation

AL Spencer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$632k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$232k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.3MRecreation & Sports$895kYouth Development$717kReligion$260kHealth$185kEducation$139kPhilanthropy$95kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $487k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$232,000
THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNION$104,500
PINE VALLEY CAMP$100,000
SENECA HILLS BIBLE CAMP$50,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$20,000
ST ANTHONY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$20,000
URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION$20,000
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
NAZARETH PREP$18,500
GREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$10,000
MIGHTY PENGUINS SLED HOCKEY INC$7,000
CAF MOMENTUM$5,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$5,000
PENNIES FROM HEAVEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIDCELERATE: $50k → 11%KIDCELERATE: $41k → 11%KIDCELERATE: $40k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ALLEGHENY YMCA: $10k → 11%ALLEGHENY YMCA: $10k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $270k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $232k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $225k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $177k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $155k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $150k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $150k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $90k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $80k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $65k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $60k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $43k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $38k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $34k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $33k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $33k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $27k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $10k → 11%YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $165k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $76k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $50k → 11%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $50k → 11%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $20k → 11%THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 17 repeat orgs$324k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$4.3M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+42%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionRecreation & SportsHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $411k · revenue +137%
  • SH
    SENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +0%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BH
    Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +46%
  • TM
    THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • SC
    STEM CODING LAB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +214%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pittsburgh Promise Foundation

The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.

Philanthropy
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
4
The Children's Institute Parent Company

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
5
Shady Side Academy

Shady side academy offers an exceptional pre-k through twelfth grade academic and balanced educational experience by challenging each student to realize his or her potential in a stimulating and nurturing environment.

Education
6
Ed Snider Youth Hockey & Education

The mission of ed snider youth hockey & education is to create opportunities for under-resourced youth of the greater philadelphia region to prosper in life. our core values are accountability, excellence, inclusiveness, integrity,…

Recreation & Sports
7
Urban Pathways 6-12 Charter School

Charter school providing education to students from sixth through twelfth grade.

Education
8
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
11
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
12
The Day School

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Impact Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Three Rivers Rowing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2,158,650 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGHURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $411,000 · Human ServicesURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATIONTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $140,000 · Human ServicesKIDCELERATE: $131,000 · Human ServicesYMCA Camp Kon-O-KweeSpencer: $444,500 · OtherYMCA Camp Kon-O-KweeSpencerPINE VALLEY CAMP: $376,000 · OtherPINE VALLEY CAMPUNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNION: $134,500 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNIONSENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $110,000 · OtherSENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCEBethesda Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 · OtherBethesda Hospital Foundation IncST ANTHONY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherST ANTHONY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - LAUREL HIGHLAND COUNCIL: $90,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - LAUREL HIGHLA…+12 more: $208,500 · Other+12 moreGREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationSTEM CODING LAB INC: $50,000 · EducationALINA'S LIGHT INC: $20,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthMIGHTY PENGUINS SLED HOCKEY: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $20,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$2,840,650Other$1,558,500Education$120,000Health$60,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Crime & Legal$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $2,158,650 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $411,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP: $140,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNION: $134,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetKIDCELERATE: $131,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $110,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetBethesda Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTY PENGUINS SLED HOCKEY: $50,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetGREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSTEM CODING LAB INC: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALINA'S LIGHT INC: $20,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAZARETH PREP: $18,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPittsburgh Pastoral Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThree Rivers Rowing Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF MOON TOWNSHIP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNION ↗
  • Who funds KIDCELERATE ↗
  • Who funds SENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY PENGUINS SLED HOCKEY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEM CODING LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALINA'S LIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH PREP ↗
  • Who funds Pittsburgh Pastoral Institute ↗
  • Who funds Three Rivers Rowing Association ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA30× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Upmc Group · Hillman Family Foundations · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Federated Investors Foundation Inc · John E & Sue M Jackson Irr

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AL Spencer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AL Spencer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to AL Spencer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to AL Spencer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AL Spencer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph