Loading…
· Public charity
AL SIGL FOUNDATION INC
The al sigl foundation raises, manages and distributes funds to foster the goals of the al sigl community of agencies, its collaborative member agencies, and the tens of thousands of children and adults with disabilities and special needs who are served by those agencies.
$1.2M
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$406k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$7.0MHuman Services$2.7MEducation$75kOther$868k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
technologyrit
2019
technologyrit
2020
technologyrit
2021
party activitiestechnologyrit
2022
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $759k
- $250k+1 grant · $406k
$102,726
Median grant
1
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
- AL SIGL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AGENCIES INC$406,266
- ROCHESTER HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC$244,181
- NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY UPSTATE NY CHAPTER$107,840
- UNITED CEREBAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCHESTER AREA INC$102,804
- EMPOWERING PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENCE$102,726
- ROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER INC$101,392
- MEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER AND MONROE COUNTY INC$100,093
- MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC$25,114
- NYSARC INC MONROE COUNTY CHAPTER$22,747
- STARBRIDGE SERVICES INC$15,493
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
0
Total granted
$11M
$0
Still filing today
91%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RRROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $997k · revenue +32%
ROCHESTER HEARING & SPEECH CENTER OF ROCHESTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $904k · revenue +3%- UCUNITED CEREBAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCHESTER AREA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $864k · revenue +12%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Arc Morris County Chapter
The arc/morris is dedicated to the care, support, and advancement of people with intellectual and related developmental disabilities and their families
Housing & Shelter
2
Rochester General Health System
Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.
Health
3
Nysarc Inc Rensselaer County Chapter
Nysarc was founded in 1949 to meet a critical mission - to improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.
Human Services
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for
To improve patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice.
Health
5
Regional Center for
Empower those with disabilities to self-advocate, live independently, and enhance community life.
—
6
Relay Resources
To cultivate meaningful work for people with disabilities.
Employment
7
United Cerebral Palsy Association of the
Providing services to developmentally disabled individuals and their families including residential and clinical services.
Health
8
The United Arc Inc
The united arc supports people living with intellectual and developmental disabilities in achieving the universal goals of inclusion, choice, and independence.
Human Services
9
United Cerebral Palsy Association
To advance the independence, productivity & full citizenship of people with cerebral palsy.
Health
10
Accesscny Inc
Accesscny offers personcentered services that empower individuals of all ages and abilities to reach their full potential as part of our shared community. services are provided with dedication, compassion, innovation, and commitment. the…
Health
11
Mankato Rehabilitation Center Inc
Creating opportunities for people with disabilites to support their community participation.
Employment
12
Human Technologies Corporation
Creating employment for people with disabilities.
Employment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Cerebral Palsy Association of the and the most unlike its peers is Epilepsy-Pralid Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$6,981,861Human Services$2,710,835Other$868,468Education$75,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AL SIGL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AGENCIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER HEARING & SPEECH CENTER OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER AND MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCHESTER AREA INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY-PRALID INC ↗
- Who funds MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NYSARC INC MONROE COUNTY CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AT RIT ↗
- Who funds STARBRIDGE SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way of Greater Rochester AndNY24.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Rochester And · Finger Lakes Performing Provider System · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation AL SIGL FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AL SIGL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AGENCIES INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 510243019 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AL SIGL CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AGENCIES INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Al Sigl Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Al Sigl Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines