Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Center Properties of Rochester Inc

$9k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$32kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,050
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARBRIDGE$1,050
Individual grant recipient$1,050
MARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,050
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,050
ROCHESTER HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER$1,050
MEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE$1,050
EPILEPSY-PRALID INC$1,050
THE ARC OF MONROE$1,050
ROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER$1,050
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 14%EPILEPSY-PRALID INC: $1k → 14%ROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER: $1k → 14%MEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc Morris County Chapter New Jersey Inc

The arc/morris is dedicated to the care, support, and advancement of people with intellectual and related developmental disabilities and their families

Housing & Shelter
2
Accesscny Inc

Accesscny offers personcentered services that empower individuals of all ages and abilities to reach their full potential as part of our shared community. services are provided with dedication, compassion, innovation, and commitment. the…

Health
3
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

4
Catskill Center for Independence Inc

Assist people with disabilities to achieve independence in everyday life.

Human Services
5
Direct Center for Independence Inc

Mission Advocated disability voice, choice, and independenceVision Universal access and justice

Human Services
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
United Cerebral Palsy Association of the North Country Inc

Providing services to developmentally disabled individuals and their families including residential and clinical services.

Health
8
Center for Disabilities

Independent living service to disabled clients including information and referral, advocacy, peer counseling, il skills training, housing, employment, ramp installation, emergency rent, utilities and food.

Human Services
9
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
10
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Mur-Ci Homes Inc

To improve the quality of life for individuals with severe/profound disabilities by assisting them through high-quality 24 hour, 7 days a week continuous care.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rochester Rehabilitation Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monroe Housing Collaborative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUTISMUP INC — $25,028 · HealthAUTISMUP INCHearing and Speech Center of Rochester Inc — $1,050 · HealthMONROE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,367 · OtherMONROE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE INCTHE ARC OF MONROE — $1,050 · OtherSTARBRIDGE SERVICES INC — $1,050 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $1,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,050 · OtherMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,050 · OtherThe Center for Youth Services Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesThe Center for Youth Services IncEPILEPSY-PRALID INC — $1,050 · Human ServicesMEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY INC — $1,050 · Human ServicesROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $1,050 · Human Services
Health$26,078Other$25,617Human Services$23,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUTISMUP INC — $25,028 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMONROE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE INC — $20,367 over 1y, 18% of budgetThe Center for Youth Services Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHearing and Speech Center of Rochester Inc — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY-PRALID INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL MOTOR SERVICE OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARBRIDGE SERVICES INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY CARIOLA CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes IncNY21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Finger Lakes Performing Provider System Inc · Al Sigl Foundation Inc · Rochester Female Charitable Society · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Davenport-Hatch Foundation · Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Rochester Health Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Center Properties of Rochester Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Center Properties of Rochester Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Center Properties of Rochester Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph