Skip to content
AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc

Accelerate the ethical development of effective hiv prevention options and ensure access to those options for everyone who needs them as part of a comprehensive integrated path to global health equity.

$4.4M
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$19MInternational$3.7MEmployment$29k
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,116,117, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,380,196 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,264,079 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $865k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$181,655
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE$251,135
INTERNEWS$238,083
FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL 360$182,752
HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INC$181,655
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE$134,777
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH$73,615
MPACT GLOBAL ACTION$54,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECTION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
NC
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $2.0M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.9M · 95% · 33 grants

Stated purpose: POLICY ADVOCACY · PRODUCT INTRODUCTION AND ACCESS · GLOBAL MOVEMENT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$66k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PRODUCT INTRODUCTION AND ACCESS

South Asia$25k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 11 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$23M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+523%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
HealthInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +93%
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +34%
  • HG
    HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +76% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +523%
  • GB
    GLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
2
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
3
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
4
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
5
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
6
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
9
Global Hiv Vaccine Enterprise

The global hiv vaccine enterprise (the enterprise) is an alliance of independent organizations dedicated to accelerating the development of safe and effective hiv vaccines for use globally. it moves vaccine research and development forward…

—
10
Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International
11
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
12
The Hiv and Hepatitis Policy Institute

The hiv+hepatitis policy institute promotes quality and affordable healthcare for people living with or at risk of hiv, hepatitis, and other serious and chronic health conditions. monitors policies that impact the prevention and treatment…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Global Access Project Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $9,710,786 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCINTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC: $1,958,132 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INCFamily Health International Inc: $687,666 · InternationalFamily Health International IncFINAL MILE: $5,655,399 · OtherFINAL MILEPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $520,010 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONA…CENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC: $338,404 · Other+1 more: $29,341 · OtherHEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $1,481,212 · HealthHEALTH GLOBA…THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $571,322 · HealthTHE FOUNDATI…The Global Forum on MSM & HIV (MSMGF): $347,830 · HealthThe Global F…AVENIR HEALTH INC: $198,322 · HealthAVENIR HEALT…INTERNEWS NETWORK: $1,168,914 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Human Services
International$12,356,584Other$6,543,154Health$2,598,686Arts & Culture$1,168,914Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $9,710,786 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC: $1,958,132 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetHEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $1,481,212 over 7y, 37% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $1,168,914 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $687,666 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $571,322 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $520,010 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Global Forum on MSM & HIV (MSMGF): $347,830 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC: $338,404 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetAVENIR HEALTH INC: $198,322 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $29,341 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Family Health Interna…Elton John AIDS Found…Jhpiego CorporationJsi Research & Traini…Wellspring Philanthro…The Rockefeller Found…Gates FoundationFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Family Health International IncNC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Family Health International Inc · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Jhpiego Corporation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Gates Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Avenir Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home