· Public charity
AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc
Accelerate the ethical development of effective hiv prevention options and ensure access to those options for everyone who needs them as part of a comprehensive integrated path to global health equity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $1,116,117 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,380,196 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,264,079 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- $50k–250k6 grants · $865k
- $250k+1 grant · $251k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE | $251,135 |
| INTERNEWS | $238,083 |
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL 360 | $182,752 |
| HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INC | $181,655 |
| CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE | $134,777 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH | $73,615 |
| MPACT GLOBAL ACTION | $54,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $2.0M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: POLICY ADVOCACY · PRODUCT INTRODUCTION AND ACCESS · GLOBAL MOVEMENT
Stated purpose: PRODUCT INTRODUCTION AND ACCESS
Stated purpose: RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +93%
- IAINTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +70%
- HGHEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED7× · 2017–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +77% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +523%- GBGLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
The global hiv vaccine enterprise (the enterprise) is an alliance of independent organizations dedicated to accelerating the development of safe and effective hiv vaccines for use globally. it moves vaccine research and development forward…
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.
Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.
To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
To develop hiv prevention products and other sexual and reproductive health technologies for women, and to make them available and accessible where they are urgently needed.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
Over 9,000 clients are served by gmhc's programs each year. gmhc provides a broad array of programs through the efforts of clinicians, trained volunteers, and professional staff who identify undiagnosed cases on hiv, ensure access and…
Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Aids Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH GLOBAL ACCESS PROJECT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds The Global Forum on MSM & HIV (MSMGF) ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC ↗
- Who funds AVENIR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Family Health International Inc · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Jhpiego Corporation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Gates Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Avenir Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.