Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ahu Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$367kReligion$362kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$1kHousing & Shelter$570Philanthropy$550International$513Education$425Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZOROASTRIAN ASSN OF CA$150,000
MAZDAYASNI CONNECTION$3,000
ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORN$250
ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORN$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $100 → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$699k · 12 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
43

Total granted

$699k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+39%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZC
    ZARATHUSHTI CULTURAL CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $359k
  • ZA
    ZOROASTRIAN ASSN OF CA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300k
  • TM
    THE MAZDAYASNIE CONNECTION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20k

Funded once

  • FI
    FOSAAC INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • T
    TMZA
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • FO
    FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Ayurvedic Medical Association

The National Ayurvedic Medical Association represents the Ayurvedic profession in the United States of America. Our mission is to preserve, protect, promote and advance the consciousness-based philosophy, knowledge, science and practice of…

Community Improvement
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
4
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
5
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health
6
Infectious Diseases Society of America

The mission of the infectious diseases society of america (idsa) is to improve the health of individuals, communities, and society by promoting excellence in patient care, education, research, public health, and prevention of infectious…

—
7
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
10
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The society is a multidisciplinary professional medical organization dedicated to improving human health by advancing nuclear medicine, molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy.

Health
11
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZARATHUSHTI CULTURAL CENTER: $358,675 · OtherZARATHUSHTI CULTURAL CENTERZOROASTRIAN ASSN OF CA: $300,300 · OtherZOROASTRIAN ASSN OF CA+38 more: $85,572 · Other+38 moreNORTH AMERICAN MOBEDS COUNCIL USA: $5,000 · ReligionWORLD ZOROASTRIAN ORGANIZATION US REGION LTD: $2,000 · ReligionCALIFORNIA ZOROASTRIAN CENTER: $1,000 · ReligionZoroastrian Association of Kentucky Ohio and Indiana: $850 · ReligionFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $63 · InternationalOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $25 · HealthISHA FOUNDATION INC: $200 · EducationUNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $25 · EducationLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $200 · Housing & ShelterBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $200 · Human Services
Other$744,547Religion$8,850International$513Health$475Education$225Housing & Shelter$200Human Services$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD ZOROASTRIAN ORGANIZATION US REGION LTD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NY INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ZOROASTRIAN CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISHA FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEDERATION OF ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN MOBEDS COUNCIL USA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ZOROASTRIAN ORGANIZATION US REGION LTD ↗
  • Who funds ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NY INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ZOROASTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Zoroastrian Association of Kentucky Ohio and Indiana ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rustam Guiv FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rustam Guiv Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahu Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahu Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ahu Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Ahu Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ahu’s filings →

    More from the funding graph