Skip to content

· Private foundation

AHISMA Relief Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$800
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$22kEnvironment$7kPhilanthropy$250Food & Nutrition$52
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mew Cat Rescue$800
Pilots to the Rescue$600
World Wildlife Fund$500
Blind Hope Cat Sanctuary$500
Humane Society of the US$500
Turpentine Creek Wildlife Refuge$500
The Nature Conservancy$500
Return to Freedom$500
Wings of Rescue$500
ASPCA$300
GUARDIAN ANGEL MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS$300
Blue Moon Cat Sanctuary$300
NWA FOOD BANK$52
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUARDIAN ANGEL MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS: $300 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
CA
KY
AZ
AR
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 10 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$26k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    RETURN TO FREEDOM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +57%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +62%
  • WO
    WINGS OF RESCUE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPCA of Texas
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -6%
  • TG
    THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +13%
  • AP
    AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Animal Rescue Foundation Inc

Animal rescue foundation inc (arf) rescues homeless dogs and cats in the tulsa area and helps them find loving homes. we do this by rescuing homelss animals out of area shelters, accepting owner surrendered pets, placing them in foster…

Animals
3
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
4
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
5
Animals First Rescue of the Carolinas Inc

Rescue unwanted dogs and cats from high kill shelters and other dire circumstances. Provide veterinary care shelter and love until the pet is placed into an appropriate new home.

Animals
6
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
7
The Animal Welfare Foundation
—
8
Nw Arkansas Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue animals

Animals
9
Raskels Rescue
Animals
10
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
12
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Texas; the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $3,550 · AnimalsRETURN TO FREEDOM INCWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $3,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INCTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,100 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUEL…Mew Cat Rescue: $1,700 · AnimalsMew Cat RescuePILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $600 · AnimalsSPCA of Texas: $500 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $500 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $500 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsHumane Society of the US: $3,800 · OtherHumane Society of the USBLIND HOPE CAT SANCTUARY INC: $3,550 · OtherBLIND HOPE CAT SANCTUARY INCNATURE CONSERVATORY: $2,050 · OtherNATURE CONSERVATORYThe Nature Conservancy: $1,500 · OtherThe Nature ConservancyBLUE MOON CAT SANCTUARY: $1,200 · OtherBLUE MOON CAT SANCTUARY+2 more: $302 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,550 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE …TURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC: $500 · EnvironmentTURPENTINE CREE…GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC: $300 · Human Services
Animals$12,700Other$12,402Environment$4,050Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $3,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMew Cat Rescue: $1,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Mew Cat Rescue ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds My Dog Eats First Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AHISMA Relief Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AHISMA Relief Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to AHISMA Relief Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to AHISMA Relief Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AHISMA Relief’s filings →

    More from the funding graph