· Private foundation
Ahepa 371 Inc
The corporation shall use its funds and any contributions received and any revenue earned by it through the performance of its activities exclusively for purposes as set forth in its articles of incorporation and may engage in those activities directly or may make contributions to organizations whose activities are consistent with its…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $81k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AHEPA DISTRICT 10 | $66,300 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX METROPOLIS OF DETROIT | $58,450 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA | $18,500 |
| STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $16,350 |
| HELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN | $13,300 |
| ST JOHN GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $11,600 |
| HELLENIC COLLEGEHOLY CROSS SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY | $10,750 |
| ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| AHEPA DISTRICT 10 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $9,900 |
| ASSUMPTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $9,730 |
| ANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $6,550 |
| CHIOS SOCIETY OF AGIA MARKELLA-DETROIT | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ST GEORGE GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $2,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCORTHODOX CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP6× · 2017–2023 · $90k · revenue +102%
- HMHELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN6× · 2018–2024 · $84k · revenue +31% · 41% of their budget
- OOORDER OF AHEPA DISTRICT 10 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $49k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $24k
- ADAHEPA DISTRICT 10one grant, 2020 · $12k
INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide coptic orthodox content through electronic mediums.
To support the growth of Orthodox Christianity in America The corporation is organized and operated exclusively for religious and charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code
The american hellenic educational progressive association's mission is to promote the hellenic ideals of education, philanthropy, civic responsibility, family and individual excellence.
Supporting the promotion of hellenism and charitable, educational and religious purposes.
Ahi is an independent non-profit, public policy and advocacy center that works to strengthen relations between the united states, greece, cyprus and within the greek american community.
Faith an endowment for orthodoxy and hellenism mission is to promote hellenism, support the greek orthodox faith, and celebrate excellence in education for future generations. supporting programs and scholarship initiatives to educate and…
To be a biblically-grounded, holy spirit-empowered, accredited christian college that prepares men and women who will teach, reach, lead, and minister to others out of their identity in christ through relational, hands-on training for life…
The organization's purpose is to be the premier online platform promising access to the fullest life through a timeless faith.
To support charitable programs and institutions devoted to the education of greek students.
The broad mission of the ASCSA has remained constant over its distinguished history: teaching research archaeological exploration publication and dissemination of research. Founded in 1881 the ASCSA provides graduate students and scholars…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Federation of Cypriot American Organizations Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds HELLENIC MUSEUM OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds ORDER OF AHEPA DISTRICT 10 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF CYPRIOT AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Katsaros Family Foundation · Joannides Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ahepa 371 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ahepa 371 Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ahepa 371 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.