Skip to content

· Private foundation

Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.0M
Granted FY2017
24
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k13 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $729k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.2M
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASH CO MD$1,300,000
MASON DIXON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF$602,000
USMH CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES ED$250,000
MARYLAND THEATRE$204,000
POTOMAC PLAYMAKERS$200,000
BROOKE'S HOUSE$100,000
HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$100,000
SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME$75,000
THE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM$50,000
WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION$20,000
DIAKON CHILD FAMILY MINISTRIES$10,000
BARBARA INGRAM SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$6,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON$5,000
GIRLS INC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $100k → 12%HAGERSTOWN DAY NURSERY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Club At Hagerstown Inc

Promote and provide social activities for members

—
2
Washington County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The organization provides programs and services that meet the business and professional needs of its members while promoting efforts to make the community a great place to live and work.

—
3
Washington County Historical Society Inc

The organization is charged with fostering an interest in the history of washington county, maryland and the vicinity.

Arts & Culture
4
Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Inc

Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.

Youth Development
5
House of Hope of Washington County

To provide socialization opportunities, meaningful activities, a caring community that fosters mutual support, programs, activitities and an environment that foster recovery.

Health
6
Hospice of Washington County Inc

To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…

—
7
Woman's Club of Bethesda Inc

Promotion of civic and economic interests by contributions to health and humanities.

—
8
Mt Washington Childrens Center

Childrens day care center

Human Services
9
Washington County Arts Council Inc

Promotes the arts and related activities at local, state and national levels

—
10
Washington County Historical Society

See schedule osince our founding in 1956 as the wa county historical society, we've worked to preserve the artifacts and narratives that define the tualatin valley's unique place in the world. by collaborating with others to explore how…

Arts & Culture
11
The Washington Home Inc
Health
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Washington County Maryland Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Living Alternatives Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hagerstown Day Nursery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASH CO MD: $1,300,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASH CO MDMASON DIXON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF: $602,000 · OtherMASON DIXON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OFUSMH CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES ED: $250,000 · OtherUSMH CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES EDMARYLAND THEATRE: $204,000 · OtherMARYLAND THEATRE+10 more: $116,000 · OtherPotomac Playmakers Inc: $200,000 · Arts & CulturePotomac Pl…THE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DANISH…WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S CL…HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $100,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesBROOKES HOUSE INC: $100,000 · HealthGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentROBERT W JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsSenior Living Alternatives Inc: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterPOTOMAC VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$2,472,000Arts & Culture$270,000Human Services$102,000Health$100,000Youth Development$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKES HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSenior Living Alternatives Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPOTOMAC VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland IncMD26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Richard N Funkhouser Foundationinc · The Hamilton Family Foundation Inc · Alice V & David W Fletcher Foundation Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · W Lee & Rosalie Ridenour Foundation Inc · Holzapfel Family Charitable Foundation C/O James Holzapfel · Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated · Nora Roberts Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Potomac Playmakers Inc: 31% of income from government
  • San Mar Children's Home Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Maryland Symphony Orchestra Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Agnita M Stine Schreiber’s filings →

More from the funding graph