· Private foundation
Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY | $50,000 |
| SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME | $50,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT | $50,000 |
| REACH OF WASHINGTON COUNTY | $35,000 |
| INTER FAITH SERVICE COALITION | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC | $25,000 |
| BROOKE'S HOUSE | $25,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY | $20,000 |
| HAGERSTOWN AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| COLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM | $10,000 |
| LADDERS TO LEADERS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $620k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC6× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +99%
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $225k · revenue +36%- GIGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY6× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASH CO MDone grant, 2022 · $100k
- USUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF MD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $50k
- AOARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…
The joseph richey house inc. provided hospice home care and palliative care for terminally ill adults and children. the joseph richey house was closed in december 2021. services are now provided by gilchrist center baltimore.
Woodley house enables district of columbia residents with mental health disorders to live full and healthy lives with dignity by providing supportive housing and services.
Ucrhh, also known as senator bob hooper house, is an assisted living facility specializing in hospice care, offering a homelike setting for those who are unable to have their needs met at home. our mission is for all families in our…
Our mission is to empower chronically mentally ill adults in our community to achieve and maintain the highest possible level of independence. we accomplish this by providing compassionate, comprehensive services - including outpatient…
Gilchrist hospice care is organized and operated excludively as a nonprofit charitable and educational organization within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code for the following purposes: (1) to develop, own,…
Anchor homes operates a faith-based recovery program and believes in helping people of all races, nationality, social class, religion, gender, and language with recovery programming and housing. we believe that the answer to addiction is…
Develops affordable and supportive multifamily rental housing in baltimore. our projects are designed to be community-centered, environmentally sustainable and deeply affordable.
Resurrection power provides faith-based addiction recovery houses. pastoral care is provided to help build residents' spiritual recovery.
To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.
44-Bed licensed nursing home in Hyattsville, Maryland that provides nursing care services to its residents
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Free Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIUM SANCTORUM ANGELORUM ↗
- Who funds SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKES HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RELIGIOUS EFFORT TO ASSIST AND CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC (REACH) ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds GATEKEEPERS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LADDERS TO LEADERS LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Alice V & David W Fletcher Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Family Foundation Inc · Richard N Funkhouser Foundationinc · Holzapfel Family Charitable Foundation C/O James Holzapfel · Pauline K Anderson Foundation Inc · The Jone L Bowman Foundation Inc · United Way of Washington County Maryland Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation · W Lee & Rosalie Ridenour Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- San Mar Children's Home Inc — 29% of income from government
- Gatekeepers Corporation — 13% of income from government
- Interfaith Service Coalition of Hancock Maryland Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.