· Private foundation
Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation
Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k13 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $729k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASH CO MD | $1,300,000 |
| MASON DIXON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF | $602,000 |
| USMH CENTER OF HEALTH SCIENCES ED | $250,000 |
| MARYLAND THEATRE | $204,000 |
| POTOMAC PLAYMAKERS | $200,000 |
| BROOKE'S HOUSE | $100,000 |
| HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY | $100,000 |
| SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME | $75,000 |
| THE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| DIAKON CHILD FAMILY MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| BARBARA INGRAM SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS | $6,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO | $5,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote and provide social activities for members
The organization provides programs and services that meet the business and professional needs of its members while promoting efforts to make the community a great place to live and work.
The organization is charged with fostering an interest in the history of washington county, maryland and the vicinity.
Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.
To provide socialization opportunities, meaningful activities, a caring community that fosters mutual support, programs, activitities and an environment that foster recovery.
To work together with our interdisciplinary team to provide quality, coordinated, comprehensive patient and family-centered care that addresses the physical, spiritual, emotional and practical needs of our patients. we encourage our…
Promotion of civic and economic interests by contributions to health and humanities.
Childrens day care center
Promotes the arts and related activities at local, state and national levels
See schedule osince our founding in 1956 as the wa county historical society, we've worked to preserve the artifacts and narratives that define the tualatin valley's unique place in the world. by collaborating with others to explore how…
To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Living Alternatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hagerstown Day Nursery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Potomac Playmakers Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKES HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN MAR CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE DANISH IMMIGRANT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W JOHNSON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Living Alternatives Inc ↗
- Who funds HAGERSTOWN DAY NURSERY ↗
- Who funds POTOMAC VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Washington County Maryland Inc · Richard N Funkhouser Foundationinc · The Hamilton Family Foundation Inc · Alice V & David W Fletcher Foundation Inc · The John R Hershey and Anna L Hershey Family Foundation Inc · W Lee & Rosalie Ridenour Foundation Inc · Holzapfel Family Charitable Foundation C/O James Holzapfel · Irving M Einbinder Charitable Foundation Incorporated · Nora Roberts Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Potomac Playmakers Inc — 31% of income from government
- San Mar Children's Home Inc — 29% of income from government
- Maryland Symphony Orchestra Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Agnita M Stine Schreiber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.