How much did AGING IN AMERICA grant in FY2024?

AGING IN AMERICA reported 9 grants totaling $286,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is AGING IN AMERICA based?

AGING IN AMERICA is based in NY.

AGING IN AMERICA

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Private foundation

AGING IN AMERICA

AGING IN AMERICA, inc.

$286k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$100k

Largest

01What you fund

0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$137kHealth$120kRecreation & Sports$110kEducation$100kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$329k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

expansion leadership

2019

—

2020

covideducational staffstaff managersmanagers training

2021

educational staffstaff managersmanagers training

2022

educational staffstaff managersmanagers training

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $6k
$10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$50k–250k3 grants · $200k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$36M

Total assets

Largest grants

MCCLOSKEY WORKS CULINARY SKILLS PROGRAM$100,000
COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$50,000
PACE UNIVERSITY$50,000
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$35,000
HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE$20,000
GLOBAL AGEING NETWORK$15,000
WESTCHESTER PUBLICPRIVATE PARTNERSHIP$10,000
WARTBURG HOME FOUNDATION$5,000
LEADING AGE DC$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$430k · 7 repeat orgs$416k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$430k

$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%

-15%

Still filing today

86%

78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
Community Center of Northern Westchester
4× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +196%
PU
PACE UNIVERSITY
2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +22%
CM
CARDINAL MCCLOSKEY
2× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue +4%

Funded once

NC
NATIONAL CHURCH CHARITIESgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +104%
I
IAHSAGAN
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -42% · 40% of their budget
DC
DIALYSIS CLINIC
one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights

Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

Leadingage North Carolina

Through advocacy, education, innovation and collaboration, the association provides expanded possibilities for aging, value to its members, and leadership to the field of aging.

Human Services

Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health

Mary Wade Residence Inc

To provide those in need with high quality assisted living and memory care services in order to maintain the residents individuality in a dignified, caring and thriving senior community. chatham place at mary wade has 64 assisted living…

Human Services

Christian Care Retirement Apartments

Providing quality middle-market residential living for seniors.

—

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Connecticut Association of Health Care

Providing services to and advocates for ct's providers of long-term and assisted living care.

—

Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.we…

Health

Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home

To improve the health and well-being of people through high-qualty, cost-effective healthcare in the home and community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Home for Aged Hebrews and the most unlike its peers is National Church Residences Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/16

Grantees still filing

8/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$328,500Human Services$137,000Health$120,000Recreation & Sports$110,000Education$100,000Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Field Hall FoundationNY13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Field Hall Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AGING IN AMERICA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IAHSAGAN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 521921433 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on IAHSAGAN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Aging in America?

Find your warmest path to Aging in America through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AGING IN AMERICA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Aging in America?

More from the funding graph

AGING IN AMERICA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Aging in America?

More from the funding graph