Skip to content
Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC at a glance

· Public charity

Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC

The organization is a supporting organization to seven specified public charities and organizations supported by these charities.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$340k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$3.6MReligion$2.4MYouth Development$757kEducation$353kRecreation & Sports$110kArts & Culture$105kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $875,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,029,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $154,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $340k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDUS EDUCATIONAL AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC$340,000
EKAL VIDYALAY FOUNDATION OF USA$100,000
HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$100,000
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC$100,000
TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE$100,000
CHINMAYA MISSION OF ORLANDO INC$100,000
ARYA PRATHINIDHI SABHA AMERICA$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEWA International Inc: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 7 repeat orgs$605k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$6.7M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalYouth DevelopmentReligionArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HU
    Hindu University of America
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×19 · 55% of their budget
  • IE
    INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $640k · revenue +487% · 36% of their budget
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $353k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CE
    CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -25%
  • HS
    HINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $24k · revenue +69%
  • SI
    Sewa International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
2
Sindhi Association of North America
—
3
Hindu Center of Atlanta Inc

To serve atlanta area hindu community to celebrate hindu culture

Religion
4
Sri Veda Vidya Peetham

Hindu temple

Religion
5
Charuhas Foundation Inc

To construct and maintain a hindu temple in the state of maryland. to promote and practice the ideals of hindusim and the hindu religion through worship, social service, education and teaching. to strive for spiritual richness and human…

Religion
6
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
7
Dharmansh Usa Inc

Promote the universal message of hinduism, protect civil rights, promote justice, and empower hindu americans through mutual support.

Philanthropy
8
World Hindu Foundation of America

World hindu foundation of america, inc. endeavors to promote networking amongst practitioners of sanatan hindu dharma through community-oriented social, spiritual, cultural, intellectual and educational activities.

Public Benefit
9
Shri Harinam Sankirtan Mandal Amin

Promote hindu religion

—
10
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation

GHHF has 175 Sunday School centers India .Grants were give for education, reconstruction and renovation of Hindu Temples. Provided vocational training for underpriviledged. Provided free meals to needy. Flood relief, medicines and baby…

Religion
11
Flower Mound Hindu Temple

to promote and practice the ideals of Hindu religion through worship, education, and cultural activities, while striving for spiritual richness and human excellence

Religion
12
Himalayan Academy

Hindu religious education. our most significant activities include: hinduism today magazine, creation, sales and giveaway of our hindu publications, lectures, travel study programs and other education programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $3,239,500 · InternationalPARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATIONINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC: $640,000 · InternationalINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INCEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $353,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA+1 more: $12,000 · InternationalHindu University of America: $2,046,080 · OtherHindu University of AmericaCHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO: $300,000 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO+5 more: $59,027 · OtherCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $117,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureGUJARATI SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $5,001 · Arts & CultureARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA: $45,000 · ReligionCHURCH OF THE GOLDEN SAVIOR INC: $9,101 · ReligionSewa International Inc: $20,000 · Human Services
International$4,244,500Other$2,405,107Education$300,000Youth Development$217,000Arts & Culture$105,001Religion$54,101Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $3,239,500 over 5y, 67% of budgetHindu University of America: $2,046,080 over 7y, 55% of budgetINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC: $640,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $353,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHINMAYA MISSION ORLANDO: $300,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $117,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA AMERICA: $45,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHINDU SWAYAMSEVAK SANGH U S A INC: $24,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSewa International Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMother Miracle: $12,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE KEY CLUBHOUSE OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGinsburg Family Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH OF THE GOLDEN SAVIOR INC: $9,101 over 1y, 56% of budgetGUJARATI SOCIETY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $5,001 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bhutada Family Founda…Saraiya Family Founda…Texas Instruments Fou…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Bhutada Family FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bhutada Family Foundation · Saraiya Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ginsburg Family Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC?

Find your warmest path to Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aggarwal & Gupta Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home