Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Mps Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
25
Grants FY2025
23
Organizations funded FY2024
13%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$45,000
Organizations funded a year
21 to 27
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$2.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 13% of the organizations Mps Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving24$200k8%
FY202423$180k13%
FY202321$200k5%
FY202221$200k0%
FY202121$182k0%
FY202021$170k5%
FY201921$170k5%
FY201827$170k11%
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$607kAnimals$379kHealth$253kEducation$78kArts & Culture$61kYouth Development$60kCivil Rights$38kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.0M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Mps Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 14 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $162,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLittle Traverse Bay Humane Society: $146,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetNational Wildlife Federation: $68,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAllen-Bass Fund Inc: $59,000 over 9y, 35% of budgetHarbor Springs Area Historical Society: $57,700 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetTip of the Mitt Watershed Council: $22,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Central Michigan College Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRising Hope Equestrian Center: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAdopt a Golden Birmingham Inc: $8,200 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHarbor Hall Foundation: $7,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMichigan Enviromental Council: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triford FoundationMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triford Foundation · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Tom and Ellen Noneman Foundation Co Plante Moran Trust · The Offield Family Foundation · Affordable Housing Management Foundation · Fabiano Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Summers Foundation Inc · The Kent Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mps Foundation with peer funders

About Mps Foundation

How much does Mps Foundation give?
Mps Foundation reported 25 grants totaling $200,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 21 and 27 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mps Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (36%), Animals (23%), Health (15%).
Who are Mps Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ($162k), Little Traverse Bay Humane Society ($147k), National Wildlife Federation ($68k).
Does Mps Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mps Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mps Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Triford Foundation, Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation, Frey Foundation.
Where is Mps Foundation based?
Mps Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mps’ filings →

More from the funding graph