Skip to content
AES Hawaii Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

AES Hawaii Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$249k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$123kEducation$114kFood & Nutrition$102kPhilanthropy$102kYouth Development$40kEmployment$25kHuman Services$10kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,530
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hawaii Agricultural Research Center$100,000
Makaha Learning Center$48,000
Searider Productions Foundation$25,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Maui$15,000
University of Hawaii Foundation$10,526
Living Pono Project$10,400
Kako o Oiwi$10,000
ClimbHI$5,530
Project Reach$5,000
Garden Island Resource Conservation & Development Inc$5,000
Trust for Public Lands$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
Waianae Coast Community Foundation$2,880
Maui Huliau Foundation$2,500
K&K Farms Foundation$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Living Pono Project: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of AES Hawaii Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in HI; by stated purpose, 86%.

AES Hawaii Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Na Mamo o Kawa

to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.

Environment
2
Hui Aloha Kiholo

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
3
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
4
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
5
Na 'Aina Kai Botanical Gardens
Philanthropy
6
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
7
Papahana Kuaola

Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…

Environment
8
Kaialahui Foundation

To empower hawaiis farming community to enhance food production and distribution through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
9
Hawaii Education Institute
—
10
Kipuka Kuleana Inc

The mission of Kipuka Kuleana Inc. is to perpetuate ahupuaa (traditional Hawaiian land division) based natural resource management & connection to place through protection and care of cultural landscapes and family lands. Kipuka Kuleana…

Environment
11
Hoomahua Foundation

To support education primarily in the Waianae community on the island of Oahu. Support may included, but not be limited to, professional development, student support services, and community engagement. As educators on the Waianae coast,…

Education
12
Kukio Hoomana Fund

The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kakoo Oiwi; the most unlike its peers is Project Reach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $83,673 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…SEARIDER PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropySEARIDER PRODUCTIONS FOUN…MAUI UNITED WAY: $15,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNITED WAYUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $65,263 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII F…HO'OKAKO'O CORPORATION: $25,000 · EducationHO'OKAKO'O CORPORATIONCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $15,000 · EducationCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAW…+1 more: $2,500 · EducationHAWAII AGRICULTURE RESEARCH CENTER: $100,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII AGRICULTURE R…Makaha Learning Center: $48,000 · OtherMakaha Learning CenterBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MA…Kauai Community Science Center: $10,000 · OtherKauai Community Science …CLIMBHI: $5,530 · OtherKAKOO OIWI: $10,000 · OtherKAKOO OIWIPROJECT REACH INC: $5,000 · OtherLiving Pono Project: $10,400 · OtherLiving Pono Project+5 more: $12,380 · Other+5 moreNATIONAL ENERGY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC: $40,700 · Arts & CultureWAIKOLOA DRY FOREST INITIATIVE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $12,000 · EnvironmentGARDEN ISLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentKUPU: $25,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$123,673Education$107,763Food & Nutrition$100,000Other$116,310Arts & Culture$40,700Environment$32,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAII AGRICULTURE RESEARCH CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $83,673 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $65,263 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ENERGY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC: $40,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKUPU: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHO'OKAKO'O CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEARIDER PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWAIKOLOA DRY FOREST INITIATIVE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Pono Project: $10,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKAKOO OIWI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKauai Community Science Center: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCLIMBHI: $5,530 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGARDEN ISLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMaui Huliau Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trustees of the Estat…Stupski FoundationAtherton Family Found…Council for Native Ha…Aloha United Way IncThe Harry and Jeanett…Silicon Valley Commun…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha SchoolsHI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · Stupski Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement · Aloha United Way Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AES Hawaii Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AES Hawaii Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AES Hawaii’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home