Skip to content
Adventist Midwest Health at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Adventist Midwest Health

Adventist health system sunbelt healthcare corporation and all its subsidiary organizations were established by the seventh-day adventist church to bring a ministry of healing and health to the communities served.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$283k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MEducation$188kHuman Services$146kReligion$91kHousing & Shelter$60kAnimals$50kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $355,617, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,186,998 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $831,381 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $250k+1 grant · $283k
$32,946
Median grant
1
States reached
$561M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION$282,671
HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY$32,946
ROTARY CLUB OF HINSDALE FOUNDATION INC$20,000
THE COMMUNITY HOUSE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $68k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $34k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $23k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $23k → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $20k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $15k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $15k → 7%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 10 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$2.6M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-7%

Still filing today

80%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +136%
  • PC
    PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2022 · $365k · revenue +350%
  • AC
    AGING CARE CONNECTIONS
    4× · 2017–2022 · $146k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • PC
    PILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IC
    ILLINOIS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • OB
    OAK BROOK PARK DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
2
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
3
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
4
Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
5
Bolingbrook Hospital Foundation

The promotion of philanthropy and goodwill for adventist bolingbrook hospital.

—
6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Deaconess Health System Inc

At deaconess health system, our values are based on our commitment to quality. we define quality as the continuous improvement of services to meet the needs and exceed the expectations of the customers we serve. continued on schedule oour…

Health
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
Cgh Health Foundation

Pursuing healthier lives for the people of the Sauk Valley.

—
10
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
12
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare

Elmhurst memorial healthcare follows the mission of endeavor health. the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and services…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hinsdale Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hinsdale Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION: $1,671,193 · HealthDUPAGE HEALTH COALITIONPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $364,500 · HealthPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH+3 more: $63,304 · HealthHINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $117,946 · OtherHINSDALE AD…PILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50,000 · OtherPILLARS COM…ILLINOIS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS: $40,000 · OtherILLINOIS CO…Lake Union Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists: $33,137 · OtherLake Union …OAK BROOK PARK DISTRICT: $27,500 · OtherOAK BROOK P…HINSDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16,000 · OtherHINSDALE CH…+1 more: $7,375 · OtherAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $146,250 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $60,000 · Human ServicesROTARY CLUB OF HINSDALE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationChicago Zoological Society: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyManitoqua Ministries Inc: $10,452 · Religion
Health$2,098,997Other$291,958Human Services$206,250Education$70,000Animals$50,000Philanthropy$50,000Religion$10,452

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUPAGE HEALTH COALITION: $1,671,193 over 9y, 11% of budgetPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $364,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $146,250 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF HINSDALE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute: $37,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND: $5,904 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUPAGE HEALTH COALITION ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds AGING CARE CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF HINSDALE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds THE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Manitoqua Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community…United Way of Metropo…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Chicago Community TrustIL14.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adventist Midwest Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adventist Midwest Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adventist Midwest Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home