How much did ADTRAV COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of ADTRAV COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

food bankbirmingham

2020

—

2021

childrens

2022

children

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $9k
$10k–50k1 grant · $24k

$500

Median grant

States reached

$159

Total assets

Largest grants

BIG OAK RANCH$24,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$1,000
RESTORATION ACADEMY$1,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$1,000
SAM FOUNDATION$500
LOVE FOR ST LOUIS$500
STAGES OF TRANSFORMATION$500
PASCO KIDS FIRST$500
FOOD BANK OF EAST AL$300
GRACE FARMS$250
HEALING HORSES RANCH$250
ROAD DOGG RESCUE$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$184k · 14 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$184k

$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+22%

Still filing today

36%

35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BO
BIG OAK RANCH
5× · 2020–2024 · $114k · revenue +105%
LF
LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
2× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +6%
SF
SAM FOUNDATION
2× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +3970%

Funded once

AT
ANGEL TREE
one grant, 2017 · $3k
AA
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2019 · $2k
LF
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nami Alabama Inc

To promote adovcacy and support for the mentally ill.

Health

Voices for Alabama's Children

Our mission is to ensure the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture

Prayers From Maria Children's

Prayers from maria foundation's mission is to find a cure for childhood cancer - brain tumors known as "gliomas" while also providing information and assiatance to families with children who suffer from gliomas.

Health

Saving Georgia Dogs Inc

The organization retrieves dogs from kill shelters and transports them to non kill shelters in the northern part of the united states. the dogs are then adopted. the adoption rate for the southern states is considerably lower than the…

Animals

Pets Are Loving Support Inc

To provide ongoing care and support to the pets of low-income atlanta area persons living with critical illnesses such as hiv/aids and cancer, the disabled and the elderly.

—

Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health

Angels Among Us Pet Rescue Inc

Angels among us pet rescue inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to rescuing dogs and cats from shelters in north georgia.

Animals

Daughters Against Alzheimer's Inc

We are committed to supporting medical research related to alzheimer's disease & other dementias.

Health

Epilepsy Foundation of Georgia

The mission of the epilepsy foundation of georgia is to lead the fight to overcome the challenges of living with epilepsy and to accelerate therapies to stop seizures, find cures, and save lives.

—

Georgia Animal Project Inc

Georgia Animal Projects mission is to reduce animal suffering and shelter by euthanasia by confronting companion-animal overpopulation through effective education programs and by supporting high quality

—

Lifeline Pet Rescue of North Alabama Inc

To promote responsible pet ownership promote the humane treatment of domestic animals, to place homeless animals, and for the benefit of the community as determined by

Animals

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associatio

Leading the fight to treat and cure ALS through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with Lou Gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lupus Foundation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/46

the rest of the field

12%

2,668/22,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

36/41

Grantees still filing

29/41

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$118,850Other$99,057Health$4,750International$2,500Religion$1,900Animals$1,550Philanthropy$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of GreaterAL19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Arlington Partners Charitable · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Protective Life Foundation · Community Food Bank of Central Alabama · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ADTRAV COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: STAGES OF TRANSFORMATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 861390969 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on STAGES OF TRANSFORMATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Adtrav Community Impact Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Adtrav Community Impact Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ADTRAV COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Adtrav Community Impact Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ADTRAV COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Adtrav Community Impact Foundation?

More from the funding graph