Skip to content

· Private foundation

Act 4 Advent Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
7
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Act 4 Advent Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Moody Bible Institute Of Chicago, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Act 4 Advent Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $89k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
1
’21
13
’22
2
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$49kInternational$23kHuman Services$17kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k13 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
4220 FOUNDATION$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
CHRISTIAN AID MINISTRIES$10,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$10,000
FIELDSTONE COUNSELING$5,500
CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO$5,000
SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION$5,000
PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF WAYNE COUN$5,000
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$5,000
CRU$3,500
ORPHAN WORLD RELIEF$3,000
MOODY RADIO$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 9%FIELDSTONE COUNSELING: $6k → 13%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $5k → 10%MERCY'S GATE: $500 → 9%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Act 4 Advent Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Act 4 Advent Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 4 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$30k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Christian Aid Ministries
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue -5%
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • MG
    Mercy's Gate
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -5%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
2
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
3
Christian Mens Network

CMN works to stop fatherlessness, child abuse, and human trafficking by equipping and training men and pastors in a global movement that for over 40 years has restored families and built churches.

Religion
4
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
5
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
6
Purpose Driven Connection Dba Pastor Ricks Daily Hope

Purpose Driven Connection is dedicated to helping create healthy lives and healthy churches for the global glory of God.

Religion
7
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
8
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
9
Compassion Ministries
Religion
10
Gospel Care Collective

Provide resources for global orphan care

Human Services
11
Opal Ministries Inc

Serving churches and christian leaders in the majority world by equipping them with affordable bibles and quality evangelical literture.

Religion
12
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christian Aid Ministries: $13,000 · ReligionChristian Aid MinistriesTHE 4220 FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · ReligionTHE 4220 FOUNDATION INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more: $100 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN CHU…Individual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRU: $3,500 · OtherCRUORPHAN WORLD RELIEF: $3,000 · OtherORPHAN WORLD RELIEFWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $2,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS…+3 more: $1,500 · Other+3 moreThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $17,500 · EducationThe Moody Bible I…CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN CHILDR…FIELDSTONE COUNSELING INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesFIELDSTONE COUNS…THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESC…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated: $10,000 · InternationalCompassion Int…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVI…PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Health
Religion$33,100Other$26,500Education$17,500Human Services$16,500International$15,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Aid Ministries: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 4220 FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIELDSTONE COUNSELING INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHAN WORLD RELIEF: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMercy's Gate: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE KEEPERS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Act 4 Advent Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Act 4 Advent Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Act 4 Advent Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Act 4 Advent Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Act 4 Advent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph