Skip to content
Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg

To inspire and empower students qualifying for need-based scholarships to become future community leaders through a rigorous middle school program coupled with ongoing graduate support.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$567k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $44,919, the rows itemized in this filing. The $51,179 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,260 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$8,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY$30,246
ST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC$8,300
NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$6,373
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY: $30k → 12%CHATHAM HALL SCHOOL: $12k → 14%ST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $15k → 12%CHATHAM HALL SCHOOL: $12k → 14%ADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY: $14k → 12%CHATHAM HALL: $12k → 14%ADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY: $12k → 12%ST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $8k → 12%SHORECREST PREP SCHOOL: $23k → 12%SHORECREST PREP SCHOOL: $18k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $28k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $28k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $25k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $18k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $18k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $17k → 12%CANTERBURY SCHOOL: $11k → 12%NORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $6k → 12%CANTERBURY SCHOOL: $8k → 12%KESWICH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10k → 12%KESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $8k → 12%KESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 7 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$341k
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+46%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k · revenue +23%
  • SP
    SHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $41k · revenue +14%
  • KC
    KESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $25k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AP
    ACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +50%
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +39%
  • BS
    BAYLOR SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tabor Academy

Tabor academy focuses its academic programs to inspire a life-long love of learning, to instill a passion for the highest standards of achievement, to encourage personal responsibility, and to foster care for others and committed…

Education
2
The Bolles School

The bolles school prepares students for college and life by inspiring excellence, courage, integrity and compassion in an academic community dedicated to nurturing mind, body and soul.

Education
3
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
4
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
5
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
6
Gulf Stream School Inc

Education of grades pre-school through eighth grade.

Education
7
Haverford School

The haverford school, a non-sectarian college preparatory school for junior kindergarten through grade twelve, provides a superior liberal arts education for qualified boys of differing backgrounds. we are committed to developing the full…

Education
8
Bayshore Christian School Inc

Academic excellence in a christ centered community.

—
9
Concord Academy

Concord academy is a community animated by love of learning, diverse and striving for equity, with common trust as our foundation. honoring each individual, we challenge and expand our understanding of ourselves and the world through…

Education
10
Miss Porter's School Inc

Miss porter's school educates young women to become informed, bold, resourceful and ethical global citizens. we expect our graduates to shape a changing world.

Education
11
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
12
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baylor School; the most unlike its peers is Loyola University of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · EducationACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INCADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY INC: $56,246 · EducationADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY INCSHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $40,549 · EducationSHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCCHATHAM HALL: $35,871 · EducationCHATHAM HALLKESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $24,812 · EducationKESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCTHE CANTERBURY SCHOOL OF FLORIDA INC: $19,147 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $16,993 · Education+1 more: $9,563 · EducationNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $140,513 · OtherNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $23,650 · OtherST PETERSBURG CATHOLIC HIGH SCHO…
Education$403,181Other$164,163

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetADMIRAL FARRAGUT ACADEMY INC: $56,246 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHORECREST PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $40,549 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHATHAM HALL: $35,871 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKESWICK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $24,812 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CANTERBURY SCHOOL OF FLORIDA INC: $19,147 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $16,993 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR SCHOOL: $9,563 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL14.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Academy Prep Center of St Petersburg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home