Skip to content
Abundant Life WA at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Abundant Life WA

To be an effective and immediate resource by providing labor, supplies, funds, etc.

$407k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$754kHuman Services$563kReligion$196kHousing & Shelter$171kYouth Development$91kCivil Rights$53kCrime & Legal$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $275,733, the rows itemized in this filing. The $407,231 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $131,498 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $152k
$8,764
Median grant
5
States reached
$203k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Love Life$30,000
Tiny Heartbeat Ministries$20,000
Life House Ministries$20,000
AJ's Place - A Foundation of Hope$16,032
New Way Ministries (Christian Hope)$15,120
Acres of Diamonds$14,000
Path of Life Ministries$13,615
Youth with a Mission New Beginnings Home$12,824
Options Pregnancy Clinic$10,200
Whidbey Island Women's Clinic (formerly Pregnancy Care Clinic)$9,560
Next Step Pregnancy Services$9,545
Two Hearts Pregnancy Aid$9,352
Antioch Adoptions$8,764
Adoption Advocates (listed under Action International)$8,635
Life Choices Pregnancy Clinic$8,450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Road to Hope: $5k → 8%Vine Maple Place: $6k → 9%ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $18k → 9%Antioch Adoptions: $16k → 9%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $32k → 9%Antioch Adoptions: $14k → 9%TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $29k → 9%ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $11k → 9%Two Hearts Pregnancy Aid: $26k → 9%Antioch Adoptions: $9k → 9%Two Hearts Pregnancy Aid: $17k → 9%Step by Step: $28k → 9%Antioch Adoptions: $8k → 9%Two Hearts Pregnancy Aid: $9k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $23k → 9%Step by Step: $20k → 9%Step by Step: $12k → 9%COMPASSION WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%Next Step Pregnancy Services: $10k → 9%Life House Ministries: $19k → 9%Life House Ministries: $11k → 9%LIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%Monroe Gospel Women's Mission: $7k → 9%Monroe Gospel Women's Mission: $5k → 9%NEXT STEP PREGNANCY SERVICES: $15k → 9%NEXT STEP PREGNANCY SERVICES: $11k → 9%Life House Ministries: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 35 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
13

Total granted

$2.0M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

69%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    Acres of Diamonds
    7× · 2019–2025 · $162k · revenue +92%
  • PA
    PREGNANCY AID
    3× · 2018–2020 · $141k · revenue +28%
  • GI
    Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $129k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • PR
    Pregnancy Resources Center
    one grant, 2019 · $53k
  • PR
    Pregnancy Resource Center
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
2
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
3
My Choices Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

An outreach ministry committed to presenting the gospel of jesus christ to women with crisis pregnancies in both word and deed.

Health
4
Hope Medical

Hope Medical of Washington is a faith-based, non-profit community medical clinic providing compassionate, evidence-based health care services to empower people to make informed decisions. We offer free, confidential services including free…

Human Services
5
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
6
Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry providing no cost, confidential pregnancy testing; sti testing; ultrasound confirmation of pregnancy; misicarriage ministry; parenting programs; resource referrals; and material aid for clients in need of baby…

Health
7
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
8
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
9
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
10
Agape Women's Services

Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…

Health
11
Life Choices Medical Clinic

Help women who are pregnant by giving them options to save their baby.

Unclassified
12
Life Choices Care

Help women with the necessary care they need to avoid an abortion

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healing Hearts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Living Hope for Life: $131,169 · OtherLiving Hope for LifeNext Step: $93,414 · OtherNext StepNEW WAY MINISTRIES: $61,889 · OtherNEW WAY MINISTRIESPregnancy Resources Center: $52,711 · OtherPregnancy Resources CenterWhidbey Island Women's Clinic: $48,472 · OtherWhidbey Island Women's ClinicPregnancy Resource Center: $46,264 · OtherPregnancy Resource CenterCARE MEDICAL: $38,826 · OtherNew Beginnings Home: $35,842 · OtherDorothy's House: $35,083 · OtherACTION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $30,716 · OtherAJS PLACE - A FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $29,338 · Other+12 more: $141,979 · Other+12 moreAcres of Diamonds: $162,423 · HealthAcres of DiamondsPREGNANCY AID: $141,028 · HealthPREGNANCY AIDCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $92,723 · HealthCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services …WHATCOM COUNTY PREGNANCY CLINIC: $75,778 · HealthWHATCOM COUNTY PREGNANCY CLINICCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $75,624 · HealthCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTHOPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $36,162 · HealthLAHAI HEALTH: $33,000 · HealthSAFE HARBOR FREE CLINIC: $25,392 · Health+7 more: $94,899 · Health+7 moreTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $112,632 · Human ServicesTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY…STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $83,500 · Human ServicesSTEP BY STEP FAMILY …ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $75,285 · Human ServicesANTIOCH ADOPTIONSLIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $57,557 · Human ServicesLIFE HOUSE MINISTRIE…Next Step Pregnancy Services: $35,295 · Human ServicesNext Step Pregnancy …+4 more: $29,743 · Human Services+4 moreGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $128,931 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $14,188 · ReligionYOUNG LIFE: $91,364 · Youth DevelopmentYouth with a Mission New Beginnings Home: $12,824 · Youth DevelopmentTiny Heartbeat Ministries: $68,225 · Civil RightsOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $7,050 · Civil RightsCare Net: $6,909 · Civil RightsENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES: $15,313 · Crime & Legal
Other$745,703Health$737,029Human Services$394,012Religion$143,119Youth Development$104,188Civil Rights$82,184Crime & Legal$15,313

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAcres of Diamonds: $162,423 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetPREGNANCY AID: $141,028 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $128,931 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID: $112,632 over 5y, 12% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound: $92,723 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $91,364 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $83,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWHATCOM COUNTY PREGNANCY CLINIC: $75,778 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $75,624 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $75,285 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTiny Heartbeat Ministries: $68,225 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetLIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $57,557 over 4y, 19% of budgetWhidbey Island Women's Clinic: $48,472 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetOPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC: $36,162 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNext Step Pregnancy Services: $35,295 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetLAHAI HEALTH: $33,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE HARBOR FREE CLINIC: $25,392 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS PCC AND REAL CHOICES: $24,026 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHealing Hearts Ministries International: $23,286 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetPregnancy Choices of Skagit County: $21,402 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES: $15,313 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLIFE SERVICES OF SPOKANE: $14,965 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $14,188 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMonroe Gospel Womens Mission: $12,449 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetLIVING HOPE FOR LIFE MINISTRIES: $7,615 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $7,050 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCare Net: $6,909 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $6,416 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion Washington: $5,838 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE SERVICES: $5,124 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetROAD TO HOPE ROAD 2 HOPE MATERNITY HOMES: $5,040 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY AID ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TWO HEARTS PREGNANCY AID ↗
  • Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COUNTY PREGNANCY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Tiny Heartbeat Ministries ↗
  • Who funds LIFE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Whidbey Island Women's Clinic ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Next Step Pregnancy Services ↗
  • Who funds LAHAI HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS PCC AND REAL CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds Healing Hearts Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Choices of Skagit County ↗
  • Who funds ENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SERVICES OF SPOKANE ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH OF LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Youth with a Mission New Beginnings Home ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HEARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Monroe Gospel Womens Mission ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

4 USKnights of Columbus C…Puget Sound Energy Fo…M J Murdock Charitabl…Community Foundation …Knights of Columbus S…Wilkins Charitable Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Christian Community F…The US Charitable Gif…Edward Jones Foundati…
4 USWA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 4 US · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Knights of Columbus Seattle Council No 676 · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abundant Life WA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abundant Life WA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Abundant Life WA?

    Find your warmest path to Abundant Life WA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abundant Life WA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home