· Private foundation
Abraham Kamber Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $124k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $187k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND | $128,500 |
| NEW RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES | $58,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $40,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $40,000 |
| MIDDLE EAST FORUM | $12,000 |
| NEW RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES | $12,000 |
| BRUCE MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| SOLDIERSTRONG | $10,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $5,250 |
| COLOR OF POSITIVE THOUGHT ORG | $2,500 |
| BRAVE ENOUGH TO FAIL INC (DELETED) | $2,500 |
| CENTER FOR A SECURE FREE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| THE INSTITUTE FOR A SECURE AMERICA | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $878k · revenue +39%
- MEMIDDLE EAST FORUM8× · 2017–2024 · $202k · revenue +6%
- BMBRUCE MUSEUM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $107k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- BSBAYLOR SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +46%
- NYNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION-BELLA MENTEone grant, 2020 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
The naval institute foundation was organized to operate exclusively to raise funds for charitable and educational purposes to further the mission and policies of the united states naval institute.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The washington institute seeks to improve the quality of u.s. policy toward the near east through insight, analysis and ideas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America First Policy Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Point Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
- Who funds BRUCE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HARBOR YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOLDIER STRONG INC ↗
- Who funds RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVE ENOUGH TO FAIL INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for a Secure America Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YANKEE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Foundation for American Security and Freedom Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds Center For A Secure Free Society ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC ↗
- Who funds THE INDIAN HARBOR YACHT CLUB INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Donors Trust Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Russell Maguire Foundation Inc · The Old Stones Foundation Inc · Royce Family Fund Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abraham Kamber Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.