· Private foundation
Abraham and Bessie Hann Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Ahavas Achim | $51,300 |
| Rabbi Pesach Raymon Yeshiva | $25,300 |
| RJJ School | $5,300 |
| Yeshiva Shaarei Tzion | $5,300 |
| Yeshivat Netivot Montessori | $3,800 |
| Highland Park Community Kollel | $1,800 |
| Tomchei Shabbos | $1,800 |
| Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem of America | $1,800 |
| BAVI CHESED FUND | $1,500 |
| Rutgers Jewish Xperience | $1,000 |
| Khal Chasidim of Highland Park | $1,000 |
| CONGREGATION DARCHEI NOAM | $1,000 |
| MY EXTENDED FAMILY | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YNYESHIVAT NETIVOT MONTESSORI INC8× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +30%
- RLRutgers Learning Network Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +276%
- RHRutgers Hillel Corporation6× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $47k
- RCRABBINICAL COUNCIL OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +29%
- EOEmunah Of Americaone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Religious School
The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kav LNoar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YESHIVAT NETIVOT MONTESSORI INC ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Learning Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
- Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds The Frisch School ↗
- Who funds RABBI ISAAC ELCHANAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA TIFERES NAFTOLI ↗
- Who funds RARITAN VALLEY ORTHODOX JEWISH COMM ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COUNCIL OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF RARITAN VALLEY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHASDEI LEV ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Kav LNoar Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · Lefkovits Family Foundation · The Gottlieb Charitable Trust · The Stern Family Foundation · The Jonathan & Esther B Rosenberg Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abraham and Bessie Hann Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Frisch School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.