Skip to content
Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$119kYouth Development$99kHealth$59kRecreation & Sports$54kReligion$45kEducation$43kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$274k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ACADEMY$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ST JUDE THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION$15,000
CALVARY WOMENS SERVICES$5,000
CURE CHILDHOOD CANCER$2,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY: $5k → 8%CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $15k → 16%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 7%ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY: $5k → 8%CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $8k → 16%CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $8k → 16%ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY: $4k → 8%WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 15 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
27

Total granted

$264k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+28%

Still filing today

40%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +56%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • RT
    ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GREEN HOUSE PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • MH
    MOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +283%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
3
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
6
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Plummer Youth Promise Inc

Plummer's mission is to set a standard of excellence that improves outcomes for young people in or at risk of entering state care by deeply engaging youth, families, and the systems that impact them to develop permanent family…

Human Services
10
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
11
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
12
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILMAN FUND FOR FINANCIAL AID: $45,000 · OtherGILMAN FUND FOR FINANCIAL AIDIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JUDE THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherST JUDE THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCHEAGLE BASEBALL CLUB INC: $25,000 · OtherEAGLE BASEBALL CLUB INCYOUTH FOR CHRIST INCORPORATED FBO CITY LIFE WHEELS AND PARENT LIFE: $15,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST INCORPORATED FBO CITY LIFE WHEELS AND PARENT LIFETHE GREEN HOUSE PROJECT: $11,500 · OtherEAGLE BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HILLEL: $10,000 · Other+18 more: $81,000 · Other+18 moreCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BURE…WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER …ROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesROAD TO RESPONS…BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesBERGEN FAMILY C…THE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE LILABEA…CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S …MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBR…TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $5,000 · HealthTRAGEDY ASS…THE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 · HealthTHE OVARIAN…Cure Childhood Cancer Inc: $2,500 · HealthCure Childh…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $13,500 · Youth DevelopmentMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLOUDOUN YOUTH INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $2,500 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $8,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM IMPACT INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFeeding America: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMARSHFIELD FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$267,500Human Services$64,000Health$45,000Youth Development$28,500Education$27,500Philanthropy$13,000Food & Nutrition$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LILABEAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROAD TO RESPONSIBILITY INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DUBUQUE: $13,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER WASHINGTON: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLOUDOUN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…The Ayco Charitable F…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Online Givin…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Road to Responsibility Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • Marshfield Food Pantry Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Aax Insurance Education Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aax Insurance Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home