Skip to content

· Private foundation

A M Digiulian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$480k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$901kHuman Services$674kHousing & Shelter$560kHealth$461kReligion$266kFood & Nutrition$127kArts & Culture$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $410k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHBISHOP CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$80,000
ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY$75,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
ST JOHNS COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
ACADEMY OF THE HOLY CROSS$50,000
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT (SOME)$30,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
ST PETERS LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL$15,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $591k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $100k → 11%GRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $100k → 11%GRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $100k → 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $75k → 11%GRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 15%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $50k → 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $50k → 11%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY (JSSA): $5k → 8%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $44k → 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY: $37k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 23 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$3.1M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+54%

Still filing today

30%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families
    8× · 2017–2024 · $556k · revenue +72%
  • SI
    SOME INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $530k · revenue +30%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • BS
    BETHEL SCHOOL PTSO
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SG
    SHADY GROVE PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • SM
    ST MARTIN OF TOURS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

—
2
Maryland Patient Safety Center Inc

To develop and implement strategies to improve the safety of patient care in maryland. mpsc unites stakeholders to champion patient safety, eliminate preventable harm, and accelerate improvements in safety quality across healthcare.

Health
3
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
6
Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc

Mary's center embraces all communities and provides high-quality healthcare, education, and social services to build better futures.

—
7
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
8
Nourish Now Foundation Inc

To solve 2 major social issues simultaneously: food waste & hunger. nourish now is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit food bank, specialized in food recovery and providing donations from grocers, caterers, restaurants, bakeries, and other food donors…

Food & Nutrition
9
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
10
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
12
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bethel School Ptso. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOME INC: $530,000 · OtherSOME INCARCHBISHOP CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL: $320,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP CARROLL HIGH SCHOOLST JOHNS COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $270,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOLACADEMY OF THE HOLY CROSS INC: $270,000 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY CROSS INCIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $80,000 · Other+16 more: $242,500 · Other+16 moreSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $556,000 · Human ServicesSt Anns Center for C…GRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $415,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,500 · Health+3 more: $30,000 · Health+3 moreSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $180,000 · ReligionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $116,500 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBETHEL SCHOOL PTSO: $14,500 · Education
Other$1,817,500Human Services$591,000Health$460,500Religion$180,000Food & Nutrition$126,500Education$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $556,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSOME INC: $530,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $415,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $180,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $116,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI MONTGOMERTY COUNTY (MD) INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Support Our Aging Religious Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GRATEFUL HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL SCHOOL PTSO ↗
  • Who funds SHADY GROVE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MONTGOMERTY COUNTY (MD) INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTION OF BLINDNESS SOCIETY OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A M Digiulian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A M Digiulian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A M Digiulian’s filings →

More from the funding graph