Skip to content

· Private foundation

A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Borden

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$100kInternational$81kArts & Culture$48kEnvironment$44kEducation$36kPhilanthropy$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kHealth$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE EXPLORERS CLUB$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Drean On International: $26k → 9%Drean On International: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Borden’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Bordenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 4 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$126k
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthScience & TechHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    Health in Harmony
    2× · 2019–2023 · $44k · revenue +278%
  • DO
    DREAM ON INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $37k · revenue -33%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GS
    Get Schooled
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • FH
    FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +61%
  • MCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
Global Voice
—
4
The Conversationalist
—
5
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
6
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
7
National Geographic Society

To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

Education
8
Hollywood Foreign Press Association Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
9
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
12
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Guilford Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE EXPLORERS CLUB: $100,000 · Science & TechTHE EXPLORERS CLUBHealth in Harmony: $44,444 · HealthHealth in HarmonyFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $22,222 · HealthFAIR HAVEN COMMUNIT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $22,222 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,222 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCH…International Rescue Committee INC: $11,111 · InternationalInternational Rescu…Kulen Outreach Inc co Mactaggart & Co: $11,111 · InternationalKulen Outreach Inc …Get Schooled: $25,000 · OtherGet SchooledROCKY HILL COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11,111 · OtherROCKY HILL COUN…GUILFORD FOUNDATION: $11,111 · OtherGUILFORD FOUNDA…FRIENDS OF NORFOLK ANIMAL CARE: $4,444 · OtherFRIENDS OF NORF…MCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY: $15,155 · Arts & CultureMCCARTER TH…WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $11,111 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE …THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $11,111 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE FOR…DREAM ON INTERNATIONAL: $36,666 · Human ServicesDREAM ON I…CINEMA NAPA VALLEY: $11,111 · EducationAmigos Hospitalito Atitlan: $11,111 · Philanthropy
Science & Tech$100,000Health$66,666International$66,666Other$51,666Arts & Culture$37,377Human Services$36,666Education$11,111Philanthropy$11,111

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EXPLORERS CLUB: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHealth in Harmony: $44,444 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDREAM ON INTERNATIONAL: $36,666 over 2y, 10% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $22,222 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $22,222 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,222 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY: $15,155 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $11,111 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $11,111 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCINEMA NAPA VALLEY: $11,111 over 1y, 29% of budgetKulen Outreach Inc co Mactaggart & Co: $11,111 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGUILFORD FOUNDATION: $11,111 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Borden funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Borden. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A'Lani Kailani Blue Lotus White Star Fdtn C/O Andrea V Borden’s filings →

More from the funding graph