Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

A Guardian Angel Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Animals$108kPublic Safety & Disaster$500
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOBILE SPCA$12,000
ANIMAL BALANCE$8,000
GOOD NEWS$5,000
RED ROVER$5,000
ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS$5,000
WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
PURR NATION CAT ALLIANCE$3,000
SGI CAT ALLIES$2,500
OPERATION CATNIP$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 12%RED ROVER: $5k → 12%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2k → 16%WILDLIFE RESCUE & REHAB: $500 → 7%WILDLIFE CENTER OF TEXAS: $500 → 16%TURPENTINE CREEK WILDLIFE: $2k → 16%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS: $5k → 14%ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE: $1k → 11%FSARC: $1k → 13%OPERATION CATNIP: $3k → 19%FRIENDS OF DETROIT ANIMAL CARE & CONTROL: $5k → 21%ANGIES DOG HOUSE: $500 → 12%HOPE 4 HEARTS: $1k → 19%BARK NATION: $500 → 9%PURR NATION CAT ALLIANCE: $3k → 8%CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1k → 16%ALACHUA CO ANIMAL SERVICE: $1k → 19%BALDWIN CO ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 12%DAUPHIN ISLANDCAT ASSOCIATION: $3k → 19%GOOD NEWS: $5k → 8%OPERATION CAT NIP: $1k → 19%MOBILE CAT SOCIETY: $3k → 19%GOOD NEWS: $500 → 8%MOBILE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 19%SARALAND ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 19%PROJECT PURR: $4k → 19%MOBILE SPCA: $12k → 19%SAVE A STRAY: $3k → 19%SAVE A STRAY: $3k → 19%SAVE A STRAY: $2k → 19%MOBILE SPCA: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
CA
UT
AR
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39k · 7 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
23

Total granted

$39k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+109%

Still filing today

57%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR
    2× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue -9%
  • SA
    SAVE A STRAY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue -38%
  • GN
    GOOD NEWS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • MC
    MOBILE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SA
    SARALAND ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF DETROIT ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +217%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
2
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
3
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
4
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
5
Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc

Save-A-Pet Animal Rescue believes it is their moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless animals and to place them in loving, permanent homes. They provide spay and neuter services and any…

Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
7
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
8
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
9
All About Animals Rescue Inc

Rescue and rehome homeless cats and dogs

Animals
10
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
11
Raskels Rescue
Animals
12
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Society for Prevention of Cr and the most unlike its peers is Angies Dog House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANIMAL BALANCE — $8,000 · OtherANIMAL BALANCEGOOD NEWS — $5,500 · OtherGOOD NEWSMOBILE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER — $5,000 · OtherMOBILE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTERSARALAND ANIMAL SHELTER — $5,000 · OtherSARALAND ANIMAL SHELTERUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $5,000 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVERAAWC — $4,210 · OtherAAWCPROJECT PURR — $3,554 · OtherPROJECT PURROPERATION CATNIP — $3,500 · OtherOPERATION CATNIPAZALEA CAT COALITION — $3,500 · OtherAZALEA CAT COALITIONDAUPHIN ISLAND CAT ASSOCIATION — $3,175 · OtherCOCO'S LIGHTHOUSE — $3,000 · OtherMOBILE CAT SOCIETY — $2,892 · Other+13 more — $12,300 · Other+13 moreMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR — $12,500 · AnimalsMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRSAVE A STRAY — $7,500 · AnimalsSAVE A STRAYAnimal Rescue Corps Inc — $5,000 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue Corps IncFRIENDS OF DETROIT ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL — $5,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF DETROIT ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROLSGI CAT ALLIES INC — $3,500 · AnimalsSGI CAT ALLIES INCPurr Nation Cat Alliance Inc — $3,000 · AnimalsPurr Nation Cat Alliance IncCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $3,000 · AnimalsCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 · AnimalsWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC+2 more — $1,500 · Animals
Other$64,631Animals$44,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR — $12,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetANIMAL BALANCE — $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAVE A STRAY — $7,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAnimal Rescue Corps Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSGI CAT ALLIES INC — $3,500 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetPurr Nation Cat Alliance Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDLIFE CENTER OF TEXAS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOBILE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CR
  • Who funds ANIMAL BALANCE
  • Who funds SAVE A STRAY
  • Who funds Animal Rescue Corps Inc
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DETROIT ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL
  • Who funds SGI CAT ALLIES INC
  • Who funds Purr Nation Cat Alliance Inc
  • Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC
  • Who funds THE WILDLIFE CENTER OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds Angies Dog House

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BISSELL Pet FoundationMI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A Guardian Angel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Sgi Cat Allies Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to A Guardian Angel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to A Guardian Angel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph