Skip to content

· Private foundation

A Dale Buist Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$75kReligion$66kHousing & Shelter$29kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES$11,000
KALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$10,000
SHORELINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $4k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%DEGAGE' MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$151k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+276%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +136%
  • WS
    WEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +27%
  • DM
    DEGAGE MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • BH
    BECKWITH HILLS CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • HE
    HUNTER E BOSS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +276%
  • GR
    GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Riverside Christian School

Teaching & equipping tomorrows christian leaders.

—
2
Crowleys Ridge Academy

Christian education

—
3
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
4
Robinson Township Christian School

Christian education provided for preschool through twelfth grade.

Education
5
Cornerstone Christian School

The school provides a biblically sound education program of high academic standards in a loving environment that meets the need of the whole child: spiritually, academically, physically, and socially.

—
6
Crawford Christian Academy

Christian day school with pre-k thru 12

Education
7
Horizon Christian School

Private, christian education: pre-kindergarten - 12th grade. our mission is to build a solid foundation for life by providing students with an excellent education that integrates academic achievement, biblical truth, and christ-like…

Education
8
Skeels Christian School

The school is committed to making disciples who love god completely and who radically impact the lives of others in the world.

—
9
Westminster Christian Private School Inc

To provide christian education to students in grades pre-k to 12.

Education
10
Grandville Calvin Christian Schools

Equipping students to serve and glorify God. GCCS offers a Christ-centered education that is grounded in faith, connected through relationships, committed to excellence and prepared for service.

Education
11
Hudsonville Christian School

To provide a christian grade school education for those desiring it in hudsonville, mi and surrounding areas.

—
12
Northland Christian Education System

Nces partners with christian families and churches to provide a god-centered, discipleship-based school with academic excellence and a biblical worldview, equipping students to serve and influence the world for christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Rapids Christian Schools; the most unlike its peers is Hunter E Boss Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $28,500 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIESBECKWITH HILLS CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherBECKWITH HILLS CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCHBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $9,000 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSHORELINE SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherSHORELINE SCHOOLWEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $22,750 · EducationWEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSHORELINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $17,000 · EducationSHORELINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $3,000 · EducationDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $21,500 · Human ServicesDEGAGE MINISTR…CAMP ROGER: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ROGERHUNTER E BOSS FOUNDATION: $5,100 · Youth Development
Other$67,500Education$59,750Human Services$21,500Recreation & Sports$20,000Youth Development$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $22,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $21,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP ROGER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSHORELINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $17,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTER E BOSS FOUNDATION: $5,100 over 1y, 21% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ROGER ↗
  • Who funds SHORELINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNTER E BOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A Dale Buist Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A Dale Buist Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A Dale Buist Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to A Dale Buist Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A Dale Buist Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph