Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

A Child Waits Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$666k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$64kReligion$50kCrime & Legal$9kInternational$6kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $24,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $665,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $641,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$3,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lifeline$4,500
Madison Adoption Associates$4,000
Austin K Vincent$3,500
LUND$3,500
Thompson Dove Law Group$3,500
Lifeline$3,000
Law Office of Jean Cavalierie$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$63k · 3 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
20

Total granted

$63k
$60k

Still filing today

0%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Bethany Christian Services
    4× · 2020–2023 · $37k
  • L
    Lifeline
    3× · 2021–2024 · $20k
  • JO
    JFCS of Greater Philadelphia/ Open Arms
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +82%
  • UE
    UAS Eastern European Adoptions
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • N
    Nightlight
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United in Love Adoptions
Human Services
2
Hand in Hand Christian Adoption Inc
3
Carolina Adoption Services Inc

Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.

Human Services
4
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
5
Adoption Authority Inc

Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.

6
Adoption Advocates Inc

Adoption placements

Human Services
7
Hope Adoption Inc

Adoption Counseling/International Adoption: To unite orphaned children from around the world with loving adoptive families to provide educational programs and continuing services to these families and to provide humanitarian aid to the…

Human Services
8
Deliver Rescuing Children At Risk

Finding forever homes for children

Human Services
9
Adoption Choices Inc

The Organization is a full-service adoption agency whose services include adoptive placements, counseling, consultation and adoptive home assessments.

Human Services
10
Ccai Adoptive Parents Council

Support organization for adopted children from China and other nations through Cherish Children Adoption International and their families.

Human Services
11
Adoption Avenues

Adoption of children

12
Agape Adoptions

Agape Adoptions believes that every child deserves their own supportive family to provide permanency, unconditional love, and acceptance.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Promise Kids a Future Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Bethany Christian Services — $36,500 · OtherBethany Christian ServicesLifeline — $20,000 · OtherLifelineJFCS of Greater Philadelphia/ Open Arms — $6,000 · OtherUAS Eastern European Adoptions — $5,500 · OtherNightlight — $5,000 · OtherA Act of Love — $4,000 · Other+15 more — $40,255 · Other+15 moreMADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD — $4,000 · Human ServicesMADISON ADO…CCAI — $4,000 · Human ServicesCCAICATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON — $3,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…COVENANT CARE SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT CA…GLOBAL ADOPTION SERVICES INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL ADOP…LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $6,000 · ReligionPROMISE KIDS A FUTURE INCORPORATED — $2,000 · Education
Other$117,255Human Services$14,500Religion$6,000Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCCAI — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE 4 KIDS — $3,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT CARE SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROMISE KIDS A FUTURE INCORPORATED — $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MADISON ADOPTION ASSOCIATES LTD
  • Who funds CCAI
  • Who funds HOPE 4 KIDS
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON
  • Who funds COVENANT CARE SERVICES INC
  • Who funds PROMISE KIDS A FUTURE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds GLOBAL ADOPTION SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pure IncAR13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pure Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to A Child Waits Foundation?

Find your warmest path to A Child Waits Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph