Skip to content
A&M Snyder Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

A&M Snyder Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$568k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$561kPhilanthropy$332kInternational$330kReligion$240kEducation$103kCivil Rights$86kEmployment$85kHealth$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA-Federation of New York$125,000
Sanctuary for Families Inc$100,000
Hillel The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life$75,000
American Israel Education Foundation$65,000
The Jewish Community Project of Lower Manhattan Inc$50,000
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisreal) Inc$35,000
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania$25,000
Zioness Movement Inc$22,500
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$15,000
PEF Israel Endowment Fund$10,000
Protect Democracy Project$10,000
Sanctuary for Families Inc$10,000
Shalom Hartman Institute of North America$5,000
ColumbiaBarnard Hillel$2,500
Institute of Southern Jewish Life$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $60k → 10%The Jewish Community Project of Lower Manhattan Inc: $18k → 17%The Jewish Community Project of Lower Manhattan Inc: $3k → 17%PENCILS 4 KIDS INC: $750 → 17%PENCILS 4 KIDS INC: $250 → 17%The Jewish Community Project of Lower Manhattan Inc: $50k → 17%The Jewish Community Project of Lower Manhattan Inc: $18k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DE
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of A&M Snyder Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 49%.

A&M Snyder Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 14 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$1.4M
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $317k · revenue +34%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $225k · revenue +14%
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $130k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • AI
    American Israel Education Foundation Education Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $65k
  • WI
    WOMEN IN NEEDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +81%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
11
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
12
Jlens

Jlens empowers investors to align their capital with jewish values and advocates for jewish communal priorities in the corporate arena. (see sch. o)jlens promotes investing through a jewish lens and aims to increase the jewish community's…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
22/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $396,500 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY PROJECT OF LOWER MANHATTAN: $89,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY PROJECT OF L…WOMEN IN NEED: $60,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $316,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $15,300 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $69,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $45,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE …+3 more: $10,360 · InternationalHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $225,000 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOU…+1 more: $7,500 · ReligionTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $6,000 · Education+2 more: $1,500 · EducationAmerican Israel Education Foundation Education Foundation: $65,000 · OtherAmerican Israel …AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC: $15,550 · OtherAMERICAN CAMPING…Win (Women In Need Inc): $15,000 · OtherWin (Women In Ne…STREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $85,000 · OtherSTREETWISE PARTN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHO…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $17,918 · Other+12 moreZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $54,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 · Civil RightsPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $10,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$546,500Philanthropy$346,800International$254,860Religion$232,500Education$107,500Other$268,468Civil Rights$85,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $396,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $316,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY PROJECT OF LOWER MANHATTAN: $89,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTREETWISE PARTNERS INC: $85,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $69,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED: $60,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $54,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC: $15,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENCILS 4 KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundCombined Jewish Phila…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…American Express Foun…Morgan Stanley Global…Silicon Valley Commun…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY19.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Express Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A&M Snyder Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A&M Snyder Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 65%
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to A&M Snyder Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to A&M Snyder Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A&M Snyder Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home