Skip to content

· Private foundation

A & B Stein Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$57kEducation$28kHealth$900Human Services$600Social Science$500International$360Public Safety & Disaster$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$615
Median grant
2
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
westchester day school$5,784
YOUNG ISRAEL OF MERRICK$2,124
EMUNAH CONNECTIONS INC$1,500
CHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE$896
Maimonides Educational Center$720
Individual grant recipient$615
congregation avodah brurah$500
CHABAD OF PORT WASHINGTON$360
DAF YOMI BY REAL CLEAR DAF$360
SEFARIA$180
YOUNG ISRAEL OF OCEANSIDE$108
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SID JACOBSON JCC: $500 → 6%SID JACOBSON JCC: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 12 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +136% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
28

Total granted

$68k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+136%
+15%

Still filing today

17%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’24
EducationHealthReligionInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YI
    YOUNG ISRAEL OF MERRICK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $27k
  • IP
    IRVING PLACE MINYAN
    3× · 2017–2021 · $11k
  • WD
    WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • MH
    MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
8
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
9
Yeshiva Birkat Israel Inc

Education services

Religion
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
12
Ezreinu Inc
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sid Jacobson Jewish Community Center; the most unlike its peers is Bellmore Merrick Ems Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG ISRAEL OF MERRICK: $27,404 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OF MERRICKMANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $17,000 · OtherMANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLSIRVING PLACE MINYAN: $10,646 · OtherIRVING PLACE MINYANWESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL: $7,864 · OtherWESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOLCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $7,376 · OtherCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFEIndividual grant recipient: $3,515 · Other+29 more: $20,657 · Other+29 moreIZMAN TORAH SOLUTIONS: $1,422 · ReligionYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $800 · ReligionEMUNAH CONNECTION INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentCornell University: $500 · EducationSEFARIA INC: $180 · EducationYESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS: $108 · EducationSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $600 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $500 · HealthBELLMORE MERRICK EMS INC: $100 · HealthINNOVATION AFRICA: $360 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRESHET HAROVA INC: $180 · Philanthropy
Other$94,462Religion$2,222Youth Development$1,500Education$788Human Services$600Health$600International$360Philanthropy$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMUNAH CONNECTION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetIZMAN TORAH SOLUTIONS: $1,422 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATION AFRICA: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRESHET HAROVA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMUNAH CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds IZMAN TORAH SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds SID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATION AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIDRESHET HAROVA INC ↗
  • Who funds SEFARIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Caroline & Joseph S Gruss Life Monument Funds Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A & B Stein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A & B Stein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A & B Stein Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to A & B Stein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A & B Stein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph