Skip to content

· Private foundation

828 Foundation Ua Dtd 1242023

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$1.3MReligion$1.1MInternational$100kHuman Services$70k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$423k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,200,000
TAYLOR UNIVERSITY$100,000
LOVE CITY INC$50,000
CEIBA VIDA INTERNATIONAL$50,000
A01 FOUNDATION INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A01 FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%LOVE CITY INC: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders

The ministry of One Love is to establish and equip a generation to obey and fulfill Jesus' Great Commandment and the Great Commission. One Love will work to cultivate a generation of leaders who are wholly given and surrendered to the will…

Religion
2
New Life Christian School

New life christian school is dedicated to providing an education of excellence. the measure of success for students is not held purely in their considerable and notable academic achievements but rather as the school realizes its…

Education
3
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
4
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education
5
Alaska Bible College

In accordance with the mandate of matthew 28:19-20 and 2 timothy 2:2, alaska bible college seeks to train servants who lead with christlike character by 1.) nurturing students in bible-based, academic programs that solidify their christian…

Education
6
Greenville Classical Academy

Provide a distinctly Christ-centered, biblical and classical education producing students who glorify God in their thoughts, words and deeds.

Education
7
Gospel Life Global Missions

Sending disciples to glorify god

—
8
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
9
Liberty Christian Academy

Liberty christian academy has approximately 1,900 students (prek-12th) and was established to provide christian education to children in central virginia. the academy (k-12th) became a fully accredited institution, standing as a viable…

—
10
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
11
Liberty Educational Ministries Inc

Liberty's mission is to provide a holistic college preparatory eduction in a nurturing, Christ-centered environment.

Religion
12
Columbia International University

Ciu educates from a biblical worldview to impact the nations with the message of christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Go Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is AO1 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Greenville College: $1,200,000 · EducationGreenville CollegeTaylor University: $100,000 · EducationTaylor UniversityNORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1,000,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH+1 more: $10,000 · OtherCEIBA VIDA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 · InternationalNEW LIFE CHRISTIAN MISSIONS INC: $50,000 · ReligionGO MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · ReligionLove City Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesAO1 FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Human Services
Education$1,300,000Other$1,010,000International$100,000Religion$100,000Human Services$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreenville College: $1,200,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCEIBA VIDA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTaylor University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW LIFE CHRISTIAN MISSIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLove City Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGO MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAO1 FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER LOUISVILLE YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 828 Foundation Ua Dtd 1242023 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 828 Foundation Ua Dtd 1242023. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 828 Foundation Ua Dtd 1242023’s filings →

    More from the funding graph