Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

74 Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$116kAnimals$31kCrime & Legal$24kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$12kRecreation & Sports$9kInternational$7kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,060
Median grant
3
States reached
$370k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fork Union Military Academy$20,000
Indy Humane$2,060
Christopher D Redding Youth Asthma Found$2,058
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kids Voice of Indiana: $10k → 16%Kids Voice of Indiana: $5k → 16%Kids Voice of Indiana: $5k → 16%Kids Voice of Indiana: $2k → 16%Kids Voice of Indiana: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 8 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$188k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-18%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KV
    KIDS' VOICE OF INDIANA INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue ×16
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +22%
  • CD
    Christopher D Redding Youth Asthma Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +5%
  • TP
    The People Helping People Network Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
2
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc

The Humane Society of Tampa Bay is dedicated to ending animal homelessness and providing care and comfort for companion animals in need. Our vision is "Leading the way because every life counts". In 2025, we saved 10,631 animals.

Animals
3
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
4
Catalytic Impact Foundation Inc

To use philanthropic funds to support and accelerate innovation in life sciences and healthcare.

Philanthropy
5
Denver Pet Partners

To deliver excellence in animal-assisted interventions (AAI) and enhance the health and wellness of people through AAI services, education & networking.

Health
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

7
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
8
Animal Friends Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in crisis, ensure healthy pets through education, advocacy, and affordable services, and inspire a community where the animal-human bond is celebrated and nurtured.

Animals
9
Friends of Pima Animal Care Center

Friends of PACC supports the work of Pima Animal Care Center (PACC) and enhances its efforts to save the lives of pets in need. Our vision is that every pet served by Pima Animal Care Center will be supported with the resources needed for…

Animals
10
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
11
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
12
Pet Pal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to rescue animals from animal shelters that may otherwise be euthanized due to time limitations, illness, injuries or lack of socialization and training.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Indianapolis and the most unlike its peers is The People Helping People Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORK UNION MILITARY ACADEMY — $110,000 · OtherFORK UNION MILITARY ACADEMYChristopher D Redding Youth Asthma — $10,000 · OtherChristopher D Redding Youth AsthmaIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,983 · Other+2 more — $2,300 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $18,620 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY …BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $12,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS AN…KIDS' VOICE OF INDIANA INC — $24,060 · Human ServicesKIDS' VOICE …The People Helping People Network Inc — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $3,256 · PhilanthropySocial Impact Fund — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC — $6,776 · HealthChristopher D Redding Youth Asthma Foundation — $6,174 · HealthCHAMP CAMP INC — $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$133,283Animals$31,120Human Services$24,060Philanthropy$15,256Health$12,950Youth Development$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIDS' VOICE OF INDIANA INC — $24,060 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS — $18,620 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe People Helping People Network Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC — $6,776 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetChristopher D Redding Youth Asthma Foundation — $6,174 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCHAMP CAMP INC — $6,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $3,256 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS' VOICE OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds The People Helping People Network Inc
  • Who funds TIMMY GLOBAL HEALTH INC
  • Who funds Christopher D Redding Youth Asthma Foundation
  • Who funds CHAMP CAMP INC
  • Who funds TEAMMATES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Social Impact Fund

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 74 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph