Skip to content

· Private foundation

5Rivers Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$345k
Granted FY2024still arriving
72
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$718kPhilanthropy$444kReligion$241kArts & Culture$202kInternational$70kFood & Nutrition$17kHuman Services$8kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k67 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM$75,000
DASVANDH NETWORK$50,000
U C SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION$20,000
G Singh$10,000
SIKH RESEARCH INSTITUTE SRI$10,000
SIKH DHARMA OF PHOENIX$6,000
J Singh$5,488
M Singh$5,000
KHALSA GURMAT CENTER$5,000
K Singh$5,000
K Vuggirla$5,000
A Nolastname$5,000
SIKH DHARMA INTERNATIONAL$5,000
J Singh$5,000
S Kaur$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $444k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DASVANDH NETWORK: $80k → 16%DASVANDH NETWORK: $80k → 8%DASVANDH NETWORK: $80k → 8%DASVANDH NETWORK: $50k → 16%DASVANDH NETWORK: $78k → 8%DASVANDH NETWORK: $5k → 16%DASVANDH NETWORK: $71k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 49 repeat orgs$682k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
138

Total granted

$1.0M
$514k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+33%

Still filing today

10%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesReligionInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DN
    DASVANDH NETWORK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $444k · revenue ×13 · 61% of their budget
  • SR
    Sikh Research Institute
    7× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +166%
  • PA
    PHOENIX ART MUSEUM
    3× · 2019–2023 · $60k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GI
    GLOBAL INDIA FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue 0%
  • IM
    IK MANZIL
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue -95%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sikh Information Centre

The Sikh Information Centre is based on Sikhi which stresses unity truth and creativity of a personal spiritual enlightenment The organization strives to develop evaluate and disseminate articles programs and social events at a local…

Human Services
2
Sikh Council On Religion and Education Inc
Religion
3
Khalsa Foundation

Khalsa foundation california seeks to empower and advocate for the sikh and punjabi communities in the united states, fostering a sense of belonging and promoting holistic well-being through the sikh way of being. we strive to build a…

Religion
4
Artronika

ARTRONIKA is a collective of Los Angeles based artists that produce immersive arts programming showcasing an array of South Asian talent and culture. Through innovative and inclusive events, we reimagine traditional music, art, and…

—
5
The Sikh Coalition

The sikh coalition is a community based organization that works towards the realization of civil and human rights for all people. in particular, we work towards a world where sikhs may freely practice and enjoy their faith while fostering…

Civil Rights
6
The Sikh Center Sf Bay Area

To promote the sikh religion.

—
7
Ranjit Nagara

Restoration and preservation of abandonded sikh historical site

Religion
8
Guru Gobind Singh Foundation Trust

Guru gobind singh foundation (ggsf) is a gurdwara that is a spiritual center an institution with a vision to create worldwide awareness regarding sikhs and sikhism. ggsfs mission has been to enhance the image of sikhs thru every possible…

Religion
9
Guru Nanak Mission Inc

To practice, promote and preach the principles of guru nanak dev ji's message of universal brotherhood as taught by the ten sikh gurus and sri guru granth sahib. the gurudwara sahib was formed to cater to the religious, social and cultural…

Religion
10
Gujaratis of North America
Arts & Culture
11
Khalis Inc

Sikh media and educational resources, education and promotion of sikh culture

Religion
12
Sikh Human Development Foundation

Grant of scholarships

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cyber Sikh Organization a Non-Profit California Public Benefit; the most unlike its peers is Ik Manzil. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM: $75,000 · OtherROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUMIK MANZIL: $60,000 · OtherIK MANZILPANJAB DIGITAL LIBRARY USA: $45,000 · Other+184 more: $752,646 · Other+184 moreDASVANDH NETWORK: $443,900 · Human ServicesDASVANDH NETWORK+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesSikh Research Institute: $80,000 · ReligionKHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $5,000 · ReligionGLOBAL INDIA FUND INC: $70,000 · InternationalLUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $60,000 · Arts & CulturePanjab Digital Library USA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $7,000 · Arts & CultureUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationTHE CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION A NON-PROFIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT: $12,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSikh American Legal Defense & Education: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$932,646Human Services$448,900Religion$85,000International$80,000Arts & Culture$77,000Education$57,000Civil Rights$5,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDASVANDH NETWORK: $443,900 over 6y, 61% of budgetSikh Research Institute: $80,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetGLOBAL INDIA FUND INC: $70,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetIK MANZIL: $60,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNanak Prachar Sabha Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION A NON-PROFIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT: $12,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPanjab Digital Library USA: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUNJABI AMERICAN HERITAGE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSikh American Legal Defense & Education: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DASVANDH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Sikh Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL INDIA FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IK MANZIL ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nanak Prachar Sabha Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION A NON-PROFIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT ↗
  • Who funds LUDHIANA CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE BOARD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Panjab Digital Library USA ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gurmehar FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gurmehar Foundation · Beyond Borders Foundation Inc · Bhai Jaita Foundation Inc · S Kirpal Singh Family Foundation Tr · Dasvandh Network · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 5Rivers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 5Rivers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 5Rivers Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 5Rivers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 5Rivers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph