Skip to content

· Private foundation

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$490kRecreation & Sports$109kHealth$78kHuman Services$74kYouth Development$49kPhilanthropy$22kArts & Culture$3kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC$16,200
DEGENSTEIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$8,800
GREATER SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY YMCA$8,000
WEST END LIBRARY INC$5,400
MOUNT CARMEL AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
RALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
MONTGOMERY HOUSE INC$5,400
MILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
DEGENSTEIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$5,400
PRIESTLEY-FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY$5,400
SHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRA$5,400
THE THOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY$5,400
JANE & ANNETTA M HERR MEMORIAL LIBR$5,400
SHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION A NONP$5,000
SPREADING ANTLERS CHILDRENS FOUNDAT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DWELL-LYCOMING COUNTY: $1k → 12%GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $350 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $350 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$714k · 23 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$714k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+47%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JR
    JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +17%
  • PF
    PRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +6%
  • GS
    Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSA
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -20%
  • UK
    US KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Murrysville Community Library

The Murrysville Community Library serves the communitys evolving informational needs. We connect people with ideas and information, promote lifelong learning, and help build the community.

Education
2
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
3
Mountain Lakes Free Public Library

The mission of the Mountain Lakes Free Public Library is to provide free access to books, periodicals, magazines, audio, video, digital and internet media

Education
4
Montour Falls Memorial Library

The montour falls library creates an environment that nurtures intellectual freedom, encourages lifelong learning, offers open access to resources, supports new technologies, respects cultural diversity, and embraces the future.

Education
5
Riegelsville Public Library

The Organization serves Riegelsville Borough and Durham Township, providing and accessing print and multimedia resources for patrons of all ages in a professional and courteous environment.

Education
6
Millvale Community Library

To ensure the preservation and transmission of society's knowledge, history and culture, and to provide the people of Millvale with free and open access to information for education, recreation and reference.

Education
7
Monessen Public Library

Monessen Public Library provides collection facilities and services to the people of the Monessen community, which assists them in fulfilling their need for information, research sources, and cultural enrichment.

—
8
Moore Memorial Library

Public librarythis organization provides valuable library services to the local community. over 50,000 items are checked out

—
9
Mifflin County Library Association

To provide materials and services to help county residents meet their information needs.

—
10
Western Pocono Community Library

Public Library open free of charge to all members of the community

—
11
Parkesburg Free Library

The mission of the Parkesburg Free Library is to provide the Parkesburg Borough and surrounding communities with book materials and information necessary for personal growth and life long learning. We seek to guide community and business…

—
12
Honey Brook Community Library

Operation of a community library in honey brook, pennsylvania.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Snyder County Libraries Inc; the most unlike its peers is William J and Ann M Roll Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $98,812 · OtherJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient: $71,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $52,012 · OtherPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARYSHIKELLAMY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $49,600 · OtherSHIKELLAMY SCHOOL DISTRICTSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $40,162 · OtherSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INCGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $39,000 · OtherGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCASUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSA: $34,500 · OtherSUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSAJANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $25,162 · OtherTHOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY: $24,062 · OtherMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,424 · OtherSNYDER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARIES: $20,362 · Other+15 more: $111,724 · Other+15 moreSHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION: $70,900 · EducationSHIKELLAMY BRAVES…SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $29,100 · EducationSNYDER COUNTY LIB…WEST END LIBRARY INC: $25,162 · EducationWEST END LIBRARY …+1 more: $1,500 · EducationA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $61,500 · HealthUS KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $16,750 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION: $5,950 · Human ServicesTHE GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesDWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE: $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$587,320Education$126,662Health$61,500Recreation & Sports$22,500Philanthropy$16,750Human Services$9,450Community Improvement$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $98,812 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetSHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION: $70,900 over 2y, 36% of budgetA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $61,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $52,012 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $40,162 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $39,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $29,100 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWEST END LIBRARY INC: $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetJANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetTHOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY: $24,062 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,424 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOUSE INC: $17,562 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $16,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $16,400 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetUS KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION: $5,950 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA ↗
  • Who funds SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST END LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds MT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds US KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds DWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The 1994 Charles B Degenstein FdnPA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Ppl Foundation · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · Guyer Foundation · Seiple Family Foundation · Sunbury Northumberland Commtr · Degenstein Charles B Fdn-Char Tr · S Luther Savidge Trust · The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 2006 Edward S Rosenblum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph