· Public charity
200 Muslim Women Who Care Inc
To support Tampa Bay and Dallas Fort-Worth nonprofits in building safer, healthier, and stronger communities for everyone.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2024–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $136,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $164,930 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,930 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bonton Farms | $10,000 |
| Asian Texans for Justice | $10,000 |
| New Life Village | $10,000 |
| Heart Gallery of Tampa | $10,000 |
| WMNF 885 Radio | $10,000 |
| I Belong Inc | $10,000 |
| Children's Craniofacial Assoc | $10,000 |
| Project Link | $10,000 |
| Tampa Bay Muslim Alliance | $8,000 |
| American Islamic Diversity | $8,000 |
| CAIR Florida | $8,000 |
| Itkan | $8,000 |
| DFW Refugee Outreach Services | $8,000 |
| Ramadan Eid Program | $8,000 |
| NYLA Productions | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.
To work for justice by building empowered community with refugees, immigrants, and local Houstonians. FAM builds and strengthens diverse communities in Houston through our cornerstone practices of hospitality, mutuality, storytelling, and…
At Hope for Her, our mission is to provide a safe place where women experiencing crisis or trauma find the strength, skills and support they need to rebuild their best lives.
To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
Our primary mission is to provide free or low-cost immigration legal services to vulnerable immigrant communities in Florida, to advocate for immigrant's rights, and to engage in education efforts to help immigrants and non-immigrants…
Our mission is to break the cycle of crime by strengthening families through support, education, and advocacy.
Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.
Chetna is committed to making a social impact by providing information and services to women in Dallas Fot Worth Metroplex area during times of crisis, done thro peer support,counseling,community education and outreach
Provide counseling, community service programming and assistance, consistent with jewish values, for the purpose of strengthening individuals and families of all faiths in the tampa, florida area.
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation. We also walk alongside them,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Muslim Womens Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Icare St Pete Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 11. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 25% of your grantees by number, and just 25% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW LIFE VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding the Fosters Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATHAN B STUBBLEFIELD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Every Voice Texas dba Asian Texans for Justice ↗
- Who funds BONTON ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds Heart Gallery of Tampa Inc ↗
- Who funds Lovepacs ↗
- Who funds FRAMEWORKS OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Texas Prisons Community Advocates Inc ↗
- Who funds ICARE St Pete Inc ↗
- Who funds Womens Conference of Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAIR FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds QALAM AR-RAHMAH INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RADIANT HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds DFWWECARE ↗
- Who funds IKRAM FOUNDATION FOR EMPOWERMENT OF MUSLIM WOMEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 200 Muslim Women Who Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Life Village Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.