Skip to content

· Public charity

2 Live Beyond Inc

To provide resources for 501(c)(3) organizations that focus on thecare of disadvantaged children, whether due to illness or poverty,that live in the united states and other countries.

$52k
Granted FY2018
9
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

International$45kRecreation & Sports$41kReligion$22kHealth$17kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$7kEducation$6kCrime & Legal$6k
02FY2018 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$6,220
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOS HEALTH CARE INC$16,614
A FATHER'S PLACE$6,720
TARA HALL HOME FOR BOYS$6,220
TEACH MY PEOPLE$6,220
SEA HAVEN FOR YOUTH$6,220
TWLUM TEENS PROJECT$4,500
BEACH CHURCH$3,000
TEEN ANGELS$2,000
SPECIAL NEEDS FAMILY FUN DAY$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%A FATHER'S PLACE: $7k → 13%TEACH MY PEOPLE: $16k → 15%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $45k → 8%SEA HAVEN FOR YOUTH: $6k → 13%TEACH MY PEOPLE: $6k → 15%BEACH CHURCH: $3k → 13%TWLUM TEENS PROJECT: $5k → 15%GRAND STRAND MIRACLE LEAGUE: $41k → 13%SPECIAL NEEDS FAMILY FUN DAY: $300 → 13%SOS HEALTH CARE INC: $17k → 13%TEEN ANGELS: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Place Ministry Inc

Empowering single mothers in need and their children toward developing healthy, safe and independent lives in the local community.

Housing & Shelter
2
New Beginnings Childrens Home

Provide a safe and therapeutic living environment for abused, neglected, and displaced children ages 5-17 by delivering services that transform lives and prepares for family reunification throught elements of love, hope and restoration.

Human Services
3
Higher Calling Ministries and Child Care Inc

Provide gospel centered teaching to at risk youth and reasonable childcare to low-income parents.

Human Services
4
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
5
Agape House Inc

To provide a stable, loving, and christ-centered home and school for young and hurting women/men so that they might come to know god, receive his healing, and walk in his will.

Human Services
6
Main Place Youth Inc

We provide a caring, family structured home setting, endeavoring to touch the lives of hurting teenagers through spiritual guidance, education, appropriate role modeling and teaching a solid value system. our goal is bringing restoration…

—
7
Boys Hope Girls Hope

Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and tutorial programming. The organization provides direct…

—
8
Kids Place at Sequoyah Inc

Kids Place at Sequoyah, Inc. provides after-school care for an average of 110 children.

Education
9
St Augustine Youth Services Inc

To provide therapeutic services to youth in a residential environment as well as community therapeutic services/outreach.

—
10
Tarry House Inc

Tarry House operates group homes to provide shelter, food and,services to adults with severe mental disorders

Unclassified
11
Salem Children's Home Inc

The organization offers a structured teaching program, in a farm setting, for boys who are struggling with issues at home, and who need a new environment that will immerse them in the word of god to help rebuild their lives.

Human Services
12
Grace House Ministries Inc

Counseling and benevolent assistance to new parents and their children.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sea Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tara Hall School Inc Dba Mingo Creek Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 · EducationAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATION…A Father's Place: $6,720 · EducationA Father's PlaceGRAND STRAND MIRACLE LEAGUE INC: $41,000 · Recreation & SportsGRAND STRAND MIRACLE LEAGUE IN…SOS HEALTH CARE INC: $16,614 · OtherSOS HEALTH CARE INCTWLUM TEENS PROJECT: $4,500 · OtherTWLUM TEENS PROJECTBEACH CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherBEACH CHURCHTEEN ANGELS NON-PROFIT INC: $2,000 · OtherTEEN ANGELS NON-PRO…+1 more: $300 · OtherTEACH MY PEOPLE: $22,220 · ReligionTEACH MY PEOPLETara Hall School Inc DBA Mingo Creek Academy: $6,220 · Human ServicesSEA HAVEN INC: $6,220 · Crime & Legal
Education$51,720Recreation & Sports$41,000Other$26,414Religion$22,220Human Services$6,220Crime & Legal$6,220

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetA Father's Place: $6,720 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTara Hall School Inc DBA Mingo Creek Academy: $6,220 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTEEN ANGELS NON-PROFIT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frances P Bunnelle Foundation Coastal Community Foundation of ScSC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frances P Bunnelle Foundation Coastal Community Foundation of Sc · United Way of Horry County Inc · Chapin Foundation of Myrtle Beach Sc · Waccamaw Community Foundation · The K Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2 Live Beyond Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2 Live Beyond Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 2 Live Beyond’s filings →

    More from the funding graph