· Public charity
2 Live Beyond Inc
To provide resources for 501(c)(3) organizations that focus on thecare of disadvantaged children, whether due to illness or poverty,that live in the united states and other countries.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k8 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOS HEALTH CARE INC | $16,614 |
| A FATHER'S PLACE | $6,720 |
| TARA HALL HOME FOR BOYS | $6,220 |
| TEACH MY PEOPLE | $6,220 |
| SEA HAVEN FOR YOUTH | $6,220 |
| TWLUM TEENS PROJECT | $4,500 |
| BEACH CHURCH | $3,000 |
| TEEN ANGELS | $2,000 |
| SPECIAL NEEDS FAMILY FUN DAY | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering single mothers in need and their children toward developing healthy, safe and independent lives in the local community.
Provide a safe and therapeutic living environment for abused, neglected, and displaced children ages 5-17 by delivering services that transform lives and prepares for family reunification throught elements of love, hope and restoration.
Provide gospel centered teaching to at risk youth and reasonable childcare to low-income parents.
Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.
To provide a stable, loving, and christ-centered home and school for young and hurting women/men so that they might come to know god, receive his healing, and walk in his will.
We provide a caring, family structured home setting, endeavoring to touch the lives of hurting teenagers through spiritual guidance, education, appropriate role modeling and teaching a solid value system. our goal is bringing restoration…
Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and tutorial programming. The organization provides direct…
Kids Place at Sequoyah, Inc. provides after-school care for an average of 110 children.
To provide therapeutic services to youth in a residential environment as well as community therapeutic services/outreach.
Tarry House operates group homes to provide shelter, food and,services to adults with severe mental disorders
The organization offers a structured teaching program, in a farm setting, for boys who are struggling with issues at home, and who need a new environment that will immerse them in the word of god to help rebuild their lives.
Counseling and benevolent assistance to new parents and their children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sea Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tara Hall School Inc Dba Mingo Creek Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds GRAND STRAND MIRACLE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH MY PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds SOS HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds A Father's Place ↗
- Who funds Tara Hall School Inc DBA Mingo Creek Academy ↗
- Who funds SEA HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN ANGELS NON-PROFIT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Frances P Bunnelle Foundation Coastal Community Foundation of Sc · United Way of Horry County Inc · Chapin Foundation of Myrtle Beach Sc · Waccamaw Community Foundation · The K Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 2 Live Beyond Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.