Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

2 G Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$18kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kInternational$4kAnimals$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SANTA BARBARA BUCKET BRIGADE$2,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE SPCA$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TOGETHER1HEART: $3k → 14%SOLID FOUNDATIONS: $3k → 14%MERCADO GLOBAL: $2k → 20%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $3k → 14%SOLID FOUNDATIONS: $3k → 14%MERCADO GLOBAL: $2k → 20%SOLID FOUNDATIONS: $3k → 14%SOLID FOUNDATIONS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22k · 3 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$22k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+210%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SOLID FOUNDATIONS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue -34%
  • F4
    FREEDOM 4 YOUTH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue ×14
  • MG
    MERCADO GLOBAL INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue ×11
  • T
    TOGETHER1HEART
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +210%
  • HT
    HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
4
Asociacion Civil Awamaki

We work with andean women artisans to create economic opportunities together, so they can start and run their own businesses. we offer education in technical skills, business skills and leadership. we connect them to market opportunities…

International
5
Young Women's Freedom Center

The core mission of the young women's freedom center is to inspire and empower young women who have been involved in the juvenile justice system, criminal justice system, and/or the underground street economy to create a positive change in…

Human Services
6
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
7
Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County Inc

Cac serves santa barbara county's vulnerable populations through education and coordinated services so they may achieve economic stability, improve overall well-being and thrive.

Human Services
8
Compassion Without Borders

Compassion without borders provides a brighter future for animals in need on both sides of the border. our mission is to find the animals that are in the most urgent need of help, yet the least likely to be helped due to geographic,…

Animals
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Santa Barbara Partners in Education

Our mission is to empower students for the world ahead through business, school, and community collaboration. we do this by creating and supporting inspiring, skill-building opportunities for youth along their tk-12 journey.

Education
11
Food Empowerment Project

Food Empowerment Project seeks to create a more just and sustainable world by recognizing the power of one's food choices.

Food & Nutrition
12
Brazilian Cultural Arts Center of Santa Barbara

Brazilian Cultural Arts Center of Santa Barbara is dedicated to promoting and preserving the rich cultural heritage of capoeira. Its mission is to use capoeira as a tool for community development, education, and cultural exchange.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hearts Therapeutic Equestrian Center and the most unlike its peers is Solid Foundations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOLID FOUNDATIONS — $11,300 · Youth DevelopmentSOLID FOUNDATIONSMERCADO GLOBAL INC — $4,250 · InternationalMERCADO GLOBAL INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,570 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN I…FREEDOM 4 YOUTH — $6,270 · EducationFREEDOM 4 YOUTHTOGETHER1HEART — $2,570 · OtherHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER — $2,250 · Human ServicesSanta Barbara Bucket Brigade — $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $1,250 · Animals
Youth Development$11,300International$6,820Education$6,270Other$2,570Human Services$2,250Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Animals$1,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOLID FOUNDATIONS — $11,300 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetFREEDOM 4 YOUTH — $6,270 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMERCADO GLOBAL INC — $4,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER1HEART — $2,570 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER — $2,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 2 G Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph