Skip to content
1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$507kEducation$408kHousing & Shelter$35kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$1k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $133k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET$11,875
ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC$10,000
ANIMAL CARE FUND$10,000
HOMEWARD BOUND PET ADOPTION CENTER$10,000
THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC$10,000
BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION$10,000
NYC SECOND CHANCE RESCUE$10,000
OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$7,500
BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $8k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF: $65k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC: $5k → 14%BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 9%NYC SECOND CHANCE RESCUE: $10k → 13%FRIENDS OF THE STOKES SHELTER INC: $5k → 11%PASSION FOR PAWS: $10k → 16%FOR BULLIES SAKE BULLY BREED RESCUE: $5k → 18%MT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $5k → 4%SAVE - A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS INC: $5k → 5%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%LAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $5k → 7%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $8k → 8%CENTRAL JERSEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 8%BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION: $10k → 10%RESCUE RIDGE: $5k → 11%RISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 11%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 12%LAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $5k → 14%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $13k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $8k → 8%BEST FRIEND DOG AND ANIMAL ADOPTION INC: $10k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $11k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $13k → 22%NO STRAY LEFT BEHIND: $10k → 10%THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 4%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 6%OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $7k → 8%LOVING HANDS CAT RESCUE INC: $8k → 10%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%THE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10k → 4%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $7k → 6%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION INC: $7k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $9k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%CASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ: $10k → 6%HOMEWARD BOUND PET ADOPTION CENTER: $10k → 12%ANIMAL CARE FUND: $7k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%SHORE SAVES: $8k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $12k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
DE
NC
SC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 19 repeat orgs$344k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$611k
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +79%
  • TO
    THE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +30%
  • NS
    No Stray Left Behind
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARY
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
  • MW
    MARIANNA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
3
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
4
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
5
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
7
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
8
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
9
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
10
Radnor Outreach & Animal Rescue

Provide animal rescue with humane education and outreach.

Animals
11
Raskels Rescue
Animals
12
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save a Friend to Homeless Animals; the most unlike its peers is Rise Again Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
12/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VET: $142,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETUNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARY: $70,000 · OtherUNIV OF PENN SCHOOL OF VETERINARYUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OFJULIA BARNHART CO UNIVERSITY OF: $42,650 · OtherJULIA BARNHART CO UNIVERSITY OFSAVE - A FRIEND TO HOMELESS: $25,000 · OtherMARIANNA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF: $21,675 · OtherCHANDLER NAVARA CO UNIVERSITY OF: $21,675 · OtherANGELINE GANO CO UNIVERSITY OF: $21,000 · OtherMARIANA WU CO UNIVERSITY OF: $21,000 · OtherDAYANA PEREZ-BONILLA CO UNIVERSITY OF: $20,000 · Other+10 more: $79,000 · Other+10 moreANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $52,500 · AnimalsANIMAL CARE SANCTUARYCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ: $47,000 · AnimalsCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $42,500 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Association IncTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $34,000 · AnimalsTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCNo Stray Left Behind: $30,000 · AnimalsNo Stray Left BehindLAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $20,000 · AnimalsBest Friend Dog & Animal Adoption Inc: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $20,000 · AnimalsFriends of the Stokes County Shelter Inc: $20,000 · AnimalsHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc: $17,500 · AnimalsShore Saves: $15,000 · Animals+14 more: $106,000 · Animals+14 moreMOONLIT PINES: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$529,500Animals$424,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $52,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCASTLE OF DREAMS ANIMAL RESCUE A NJ: $47,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $42,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OASIS ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $34,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetLAWNS TO LAPS CAT RESCUE: $20,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetBest Friend Dog & Animal Adoption Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE 11TH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE INC T/A ELEVENTH HOUR ANIMAL RESCUE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of the Stokes County Shelter Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetShore Saves: $15,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetFORGOTTEN CATS INC: $10,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMT PLEASANT ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRISE AGAIN ANIMAL RESCUE: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLANCASTER SPCA: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLoving Hands Cat Rescue Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetDREAMING OF A CHANCE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORP: $5,700 over 1y, 17% of budgetSAVE A FRIEND TO HOMELESS ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWise Animal Rescue: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE RIDGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Furniss N W Chr TrPetsmart Charities IncBristol-Myers Squibb …The Duffield Family F…American Express Foun…Chubb Charitable Foun…Joseph Robert Foundat…The Robert Wood Johns…Pedigree FoundationPetco LoveGreater Good CharitiesVerizon Foundation
Furniss N W Chr TrMO24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Furniss N W Chr Tr · Petsmart Charities Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · American Express Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Joseph Robert Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · Greater Good Charities · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Rescue Ridge: 6% of income from government
  • Forgotten Cats Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 1992 Tipgoomoogus Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home