· Public charity
15 and the Mahomies Foundation
15 and the mahomies is dedicated to improving the lives of children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $215k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $158k
- $250k+1 grant · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA | $650,000 |
| CITY YEAR | $57,500 |
| LEAD TO READ KC | $50,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY | $50,000 |
| OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC | $30,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC | $15,305 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI | $15,000 |
| PETE'S GARDEN INC | $15,000 |
| KANSAS CITY PET PROJECT | $15,000 |
| YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORP | $15,000 |
| FOX LOVE FUND FOR CHILDREN | $15,000 |
| SHELTER KC | $15,000 |
| HIGH ASPIRATIONS INC | $15,000 |
| TURN THE PAGE KC | $15,000 |
| KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $566k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $758k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CITY YEAR INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +4%- LTLEAD TO READ INC5× · 2020–2024 · $207k · revenue +139%
- TCThe Children's Mercy Hospital4× · 2020–2024 · $153k · revenue +43%
Funded once
Feeding Americaone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +17%- TSThe Shack Harris and Doug Williams Foundationone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue 0%
- KCKansas City Kansas School Foundation of Excellencegraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +313%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Kansas action for children, inc. is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to shaping health, education and economic policy that improves the lives of kansas children and their families.
The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
Camps For Kids' mission is to ensure that no Kansas City-area child is turned away from summer camp because of low income or physical, medical or developmental disability.
To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.
Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.
Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.
To provide a world-class neighborhood school whose students excel in a culture of academic rigor, character development, and caring relationships.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Children's Service League Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds LEAD TO READ INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Volunteer Corps ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds VARIETY OF GREATER KANSAS CITY TENT 8 ↗
- Who funds Seal Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PETES GARDEN ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS ↗
- Who funds TURN THE PAGE KC INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Shack Harris and Doug Williams Foundation ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH ASPIRATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City Kansas School Foundation of Excellence ↗
- Who funds Team Luke Hope for Minds ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters Kansas City ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds LITERACY KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDREN'S SERVICE LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL FAMILY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER & EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR CHILDR ↗
- Who funds SHELTER KC ↗
- Who funds OneSight ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Sherman Family Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · The Shumaker Family Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Hunt Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 15 and the Mahomies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 15 and the Mahomies Foundation?
Find your warmest path to 15 and the Mahomies Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.