Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Ohel Torah Congregation

Poverty prevention by distributing food for needy families

C$496k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$418k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k6 grants · C$25k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$53k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$418k
C$8,700
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SATMAR VAN HORNE JEWISH EDUCATION CENTREC$418,000
Individual grant recipientC$25,000
MEKOR CHAYEINYC$18,000
Individual grant recipientC$10,000
L'ECOLE BETH TZIPORAHC$8,700
CONGRÉGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAELC$5,000
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$4,700
FAIRE UN DON CANADA / TOIREM CANADAC$3,865
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$2,600
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB)C$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 85% of grant dollars (C$678k). The 15% that went abroad (C$120k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 15% of all-years giving (C$120k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$137k · 7 repeat orgsC$661k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

C$137k
C$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+58%

Still filing today

86%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$448k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    Charité Tzedakah Montréal / Charity Tzedakah Montréal
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$19k · revenue +40%
  • MT
    Maharam Tav fund
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$18k · revenue +70%
  • MC
    Mifalei Chaim Bechesed
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$11k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CY
    CONG YETEV LEVgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$57k · revenue +121%
  • CM
    CHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEVgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$50k · revenue +94%
  • C
    CAZ
    one grant, 2020 · C$50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
4
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
5
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
8
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
9
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—
10
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
11
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
12
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSATMAR VAN HORNE JEWISH EDUCATION CENTRE — C$418,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCONG YETEV LEV — C$57,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetCHEVRAH MESAMCHEI LEV — C$50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMEKOR CHAYEINY — C$32,200 over 2y, 27% of budgetYTM — C$19,889 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCharité Tzedakah Montréal / Charity Tzedakah Montréal — C$18,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaharam Tav fund — C$18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMifalei Chaim Bechesed (MCB) — C$11,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetL'ECOLE BETH TZIPORAH — C$8,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACADEMIE BETH ESTHER INC. — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRÉGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAEL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANIYEL IRCHO — C$4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCongrégation Yetev Lav — C$4,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCongrégation Sepharade Beth Hillel Tiferet David — C$4,454 over 2y, 13% of budgetSEMINARY LOAN FUND — C$3,160 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG BELZ — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Menucha VesimchaZichron David and Pes…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Rosenberg Family Foun…Académie Yeshiva Tora…Congrégation Good Hea…
Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah MontrealQC16.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Menucha Vesimcha · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 731214110:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ohel Torah Congregation’s filings →