Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal

1.

C$313k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$126k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k5 grants · C$180k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$126k
C$37,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCD)C$126,292
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$46,043
RABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHEC$44,680
CTM- CHASDEI TOVIM MEOROSC$40,972
ANIYEI IRCHOC$37,000
B'NAI LEVY FOUNDATIONC$11,000
CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIMC$4,520
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$1,660
IMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION DU CAC$420
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMARC$122
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$938k · 16 repeat orgsC$443k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

C$938k
C$406k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+53%

Still filing today

88%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$143k · revenue +238%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$88k · revenue +41%
  • BL
    B'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · C$74k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • BC
    BNEI CHESED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · C$224k
  • KH
    KAREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR FUND
    one grant, 2021 · C$108k · revenue -78%
  • LK
    L'INSTITUTION KUPAT TORAH VECHIESED
    one grant, 2022 · C$21k · revenue -49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
3
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
4
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
5
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
6
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
7
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
8
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
9
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
10
Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef

1.- to foster and encourage the practice and study of the jewish religion and development of behaviour among the jewish community with the goal of advancing the jewish religion. 2. -to organize causes classes lectures and seminars with the…

—
11
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
12
Gemach Zichron Burech Zvi

Provide interest free benevolent loans to needy and to qualified donees

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCD) — C$181,732 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$143,400 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetKAREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR FUND — C$107,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE — C$87,680 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetB'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$74,265 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHEVRA MEAMCHEI LEV — C$39,451 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetANIYEI IRCHO — C$37,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$31,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HABINYAN D'SATMAR FUND — C$31,028 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ CONGREGATION DU CANADA-MOSDO — C$25,920 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetL'INSTITUTION KUPAT TORAH VECHIESED — C$21,250 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$19,744 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$19,402 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCONGRÉGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAËL — C$18,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetECOLE BETH TZIPORAH — C$17,800 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBETH ESTHER ACADEMY INC. — C$13,307 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREB MAYER BAAL HANES -CHIBAS JERUSALEM — C$12,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCONGREGATION ATERETH ZEKAINIM — C$9,782 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$5,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEIZER MESHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$4,822 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCONGRÉGATION BELZ — C$3,735 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION OF THE COMMUNITY OF PREFONTAINE — C$613 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGREGATION SKVER — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The M.K. Foundation/L…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundMifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…D E Foundation / la F…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Rosenberg Family Foun…Congrégation Good Hea…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Fondation de la Famil…Zichron David and Pes…
The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K.QC26.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Congrégation Good Heart: Congrégation Yetev Lav · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 107869786:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal’s filings →