Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Maharam Tav Fund

Relieve poverty through non-interest bearing loans to those who are poor.

C$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
157
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$390k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 157 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k89 grants · C$216k
  • C$10k–50k32 grants · C$791k
  • C$50k–250k32 grants · C$3.4M
  • C$250k+4 grants · C$1.3M
C$6,048
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MYLU TEAM LLCC$390,000
Individual grant recipientC$308,726
OIZ VEHUDORC$296,000
Individual grant recipientC$268,637
KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAHC$234,676
Individual grant recipientC$218,771
Individual grant recipientC$206,944
CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIMC$193,149
CHEVRAH MESANCHEI LEVC$188,697
GLOBAL CENTRE OF SKYERC$179,461
Individual grant recipientC$169,650
CHASDEL YAKOV BEIT SHEMESHC$157,540
Individual grant recipientC$154,520
CONGREGATION IMRIE CHINA DELATYN INC.C$140,000
CONG. LIVYAS CHEIN INC.C$120,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 86% of grant dollars (C$27M). The 14% that went abroad (C$4.3M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 14% of all-years giving (C$4.3M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$2.3M · 21 grants
ILC$1.7M · 24 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$27M · 117 repeat orgsC$4.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

117 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 89 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

117
53

Total granted

C$27M
C$605k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-11%

Still filing today

87%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$739k · revenue +153%
  • BL
    BNEI LEVI FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$720k · revenue +50%
  • CM
    CHEVRAH MESANCHEI LEV
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$612k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRANKFORTER FAMILY FONDATION
    one grant, 2018 · C$190k · revenue -93% · 41% of their budget
  • CT
    CF TORAH V'YIRAH
    one grant, 2018 · C$100k · revenue -72%
  • CM
    CHEVRA MESAMCHEI LEV
    one grant, 2018 · C$92k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
2
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
3
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
4
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
5
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
6
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
7
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
8
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
9
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—
10
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
11
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—
12
Friends of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah

Initiatives that advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Congregation of the Upholders of the Law of Torah (Machzikei Torah) of Montréal / La congrégation des observants de la loi de la Torah Mschzikei de montréal and the most unlike its peers is Chessed Chain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

185 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 185 of the 259 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
175/185
Grantees still filing
87/185
Grew since you first funded

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM — C$739,241 over 6y, 17% of budgetBNEI LEVI FOUNDATION — C$720,312 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCHEVRAH MESANCHEI LEV — C$611,594 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM WIZNITZ CONGREGATION — C$527,340 over 7y, 15% of budgetMIFALLEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) — C$457,938 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetKOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH — C$444,929 over 3y, 27% of budgetEIZER MECHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION — C$395,726 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON BURECH AVI — C$376,115 over 7y, 89% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV — C$305,201 over 7y, 10% of budgetCONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR — C$280,847 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetCONG. BELZ — C$208,631 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetBETH ESTHER ACADEMY — C$192,380 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetFRANKFORTER FAMILY FONDATION — C$190,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetCF OF SATMAR ERETZ — C$179,736 over 8y, 20% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS MOSHE — C$173,083 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$159,512 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCHASDEI LEVY YITZOK US — C$155,082 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMHA — C$153,972 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetKOLEL BELZ — C$153,555 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetKEREH HAKEHILAH — C$127,462 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCF TORAH V'YIRAH — C$100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetARIZAL — C$96,356 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetC.F OF YETEV LEV — C$93,703 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$86,845 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FRIENDS OF CANADA — C$83,098 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEHAI MACHZIKEL HADES BELZ — C$78,968 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVITNITZ INSTITUTION — C$74,198 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF TOLDOS AHARON — C$65,561 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS — C$64,752 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetC.F. OF YESHIVA WIZNITZ BNEI BRAQ — C$62,048 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetRAV HESSED — C$61,190 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE — C$51,741 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCORPS DE BÉNÉVOLES HATZOLOH — C$51,536 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetREB MAYER BAAL HANES — C$47,486 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF VAAD HARABBANIM — C$44,612 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF BELZ — C$43,038 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCONGRÉGATION AMOUR POUR ISRAËL — C$42,145 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCHASDEI SHLOMO — C$41,332 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetEZER LANEFESH FOUNDATION — C$40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCONGREGATION SKVER — C$39,714 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetC.F OF KEREN HATZOLAH — C$38,894 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetANEYEI IRCHO — C$37,677 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCONG ATERET ZEKAINIM — C$35,929 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetYALDEI SHASHUIM — C$34,739 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetECOLE BETH TZIPORAH — C$30,525 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCONGREGATION MAREH YECHEZKEL — C$29,180 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetC.F OF KIRYAS BENOS — C$26,757 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetL'INSTITUTION KUPAT TORAH VECHESED — C$24,496 over 2y, 4.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kupas Hachesed Meoroth ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION SHEVES ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds BNEI LEVI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHEVRAH MESANCHEI LEV ↗
  • Who funds IMRAY CHAIM WIZNITZ CONGREGATION ↗
  • Who funds MIFALLEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL TORAH V'YIRAH ↗
  • Who funds EIZER MECHILEM FEISH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GEMACH ZICHRON BURECH AVI ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV D'SATMAR ↗
  • Who funds CONG. BELZ ↗
  • Who funds BETH ESTHER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FRANKFORTER FAMILY FONDATION ↗
  • Who funds CF OF SATMAR ERETZ ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS MOSHE ↗
  • Who funds THE YAD EZER FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI LEVY YITZOK US ↗
  • Who funds MENUCHA VESIMHA ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL BELZ ↗
  • Who funds KEREH HAKEHILAH ↗
  • Who funds CF TORAH V'YIRAH ↗
  • Who funds ARIZAL ↗
  • Who funds C.F OF YETEV LEV ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charité Tzedakah Mont…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Fondation de la Famil…Menucha VesimchaRosenberg Family Foun…Zichron David and Pes…D E Foundation / la F…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…The Micha Life Founda…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…
Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah MontrealQC86.6× affinity100 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Menucha Vesimcha · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 259 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 843395195:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Maharam Tav’s filings →