Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Outremont, QC · Private foundation

Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation

To distribute donations received to various charitable organizations

C$453k
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$137k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k38 grants · C$65k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$129k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$259k
C$1,200
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$481k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CDN FR OF MICHON L'CHOLEHC$136,700
C.D.L.M. (CHAVERIM DONNE LA MAIN)C$62,000
MENUCHA V'SIMCHAC$60,412
VMM -USC$39,437
CTMC$23,341
BAIS TZIPORAHC$21,675
CONG OHEL TORAHC$12,100
MCBC$11,420
VMMC$10,730
CONG OF CHAREIDIMC$10,700
KEHAL AHAVAS YISROELC$8,800
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONSC$6,400
CONG KEHAL TYYC$5,600
ARIZALC$5,222
KOLEL NOAM ELIEZERC$3,600
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$4.0M · 73 repeat orgsC$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

73 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
24

Total granted

C$4.0M
C$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+11%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • C(
    C.D.L.M. (CHAVERIM DONNE LA MAIN
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$780k · revenue +24%
  • MV
    MENUCHA V'SIMCHA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$301k · revenue +147%
  • BT
    BETH TZIPORAH
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$216k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$20k · revenue +102%
  • CO
    CONG OHEL TORAH
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k
  • TL
    THE LAURENTIAN JEWISH COMM. CEN
    one grant, 2022 · C$13k · revenue -78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
3
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
4
Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Wiznitz of Bnei Braq

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.

—
5
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—
6
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
7
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
10
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
11
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
12
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Lev Lazulat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
79/87
Grantees still filing
52/87
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetC.D.L.M. (CHAVERIM DONNE LA MAIN — C$779,750 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetMCB — C$369,093 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetMENUCHA V'SIMCHA — C$300,804 over 8y, 1.1% of budget70120 - JEWISH HERITAGE - US — C$247,265 over 8y, 29% of budgetBETH TZIPORAH — C$216,205 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$182,431 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZAL — C$53,692 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS — C$50,360 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION SKYVER — C$47,505 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE — C$40,372 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION PEDAGOGIQUE — C$40,277 over 4y, 95% of budgetTORAS MOISHE — C$40,010 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKEHAL AHAVAS YISROEL — C$37,100 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$33,620 over 8y, 0.5% of budget60250 - YAM HATALMUD — C$32,250 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBETH JACOB SEM — C$30,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$29,773 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCONG OHEL TORAH — C$28,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HAKOLILIM D'SHIKUN — C$26,600 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetVAAD HARABONIM — C$22,650 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCONG OF CHAREIDIM — C$21,150 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCONG KEHAL TYY — C$20,522 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS — C$19,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetKOLEL BELZ — C$17,061 over 6y, 0.3% of budget70115 - KOLLEL NOAM ELIEZER -US — C$16,542 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetB'NEI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$14,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA — C$13,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetC.A. ASSOCIATION SLABODKA YESHIVA — C$13,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetTHE LAURENTIAN JEWISH COMM. CEN — C$13,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMESAMCHE LEV — C$11,430 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS — C$11,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCDN FR OF THE MIR — C$9,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBNOT JERUSALEM — C$8,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREFUAH YECHESED — C$8,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCDN FR OF MOSDOS CHERNOBEL — C$7,460 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetANIYEI IRCHO — C$6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budget60144 - CHSESED L'AVRAHAM — C$5,800 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCDN FR OF TOLDOS AHARON — C$5,690 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTASH BAR — C$5,390 over 8y, 1.2% of budget60125 - BAIS ESTHER — C$5,320 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCONG ZERA KODESH — C$4,567 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCONG SHEVES ACHIM — C$4,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREBBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL — C$4,380 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetC.F. IF ATERES BONUS — C$3,720 over 5y, 0.5% of budget60175 - CDN FR OF YAD L'ACHIM — C$3,670 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetKOLLEL TIFERES YAKOV YITZCHOK — C$3,300 over 3y, 50% of budget60172 - CDN FR OF BETH YOSEF — C$3,210 over 6y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds C.D.L.M. (CHAVERIM DONNE LA MAIN ↗
  • Who funds MCB ↗
  • Who funds MENUCHA V'SIMCHA ↗
  • Who funds 70120 - JEWISH HERITAGE - US ↗
  • Who funds BETH TZIPORAH ↗
  • Who funds BETH OLOTH ↗
  • Who funds ARIZAL ↗
  • Who funds VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION SKYVER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION PEDAGOGIQUE ↗
  • Who funds TORAS MOISHE ↗
  • Who funds KEHAL AHAVAS YISROEL ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION BELZ ↗
  • Who funds 60250 - YAM HATALMUD ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB SEM ↗
  • Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
  • Who funds CONG OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HAKOLILIM D'SHIKUN ↗
  • Who funds VAAD HARABONIM ↗
  • Who funds CONG OF CHAREIDIM ↗
  • Who funds CONG KEHAL TYY ↗
  • Who funds THE LEO & BINA KOHN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL BELZ ↗
  • Who funds 70115 - KOLLEL NOAM ELIEZER -US ↗
  • Who funds B'NEI LEVY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLA ↗
  • Who funds C.A. ASSOCIATION SLABODKA YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds THE LAURENTIAN JEWISH COMM. CEN ↗
  • Who funds MESAMCHE LEV ↗
  • Who funds VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CDN FR OF THE MIR ↗
  • Who funds BNOT JERUSALEM ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundCharité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Rosenberg Family Foun…Fondation de la Famil…Zichron David and Pes…The Micha Life Founda…D E Foundation / la F…Congrégation des Seni…Menucha Vesimcha
Maharam Tav FundQC56.7× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Congrégation des Seniors Couronnés / Congregation Atereth Zekainim · Menucha Vesimcha

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 812513984:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Fondation Ebs/Ebs’ filings →